|
|
|
|
|
Factoids |
|
See Actual Complaint |
|
Conway will pay $329,000 in penalties and fines |
|
Marini fines to be determined |
|
Underwood to pay $25,000 in fines |
|
All 3 are barred from being officers or directors of any public company |
|
|
The SEC announced today that it
has brought securities fraud charges against two former senior
officers of Rent-Way, Inc. ("Rent-Way" or the "Company"), one of
the largest rent-to-own companies in the United States, in
connection with a scheme that caused Rent-Way to under-report
expenses and substantially inflate reported earnings in 1999 and
2000. In addition, the Complaint charges Rent-Way with corporate
reporting and record keeping violations and charges another
former employee with record keeping violations. The Commission
further announced that, simultaneously with the filing of the
Complaint, it settled the charges against three of the
defendants and partially settled the charges against the fourth
defendant.
The Complaint alleges that, during fiscal 1999 and 2000,
Rent-Way under-reported a variety of expenses by approximately
$60 million. Each of Rent-Way's Forms 10-Q and Form 10-K filed
in fiscal 1999 and 2000 overstated pre-tax earnings or
understated pre-tax loss by between 12%-448%. In addition,
approximately $35 million in fraudulent entries made to
Rent-Way's books and records in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2000 were discovered prior to any public dissemination of the
Company's financial results for that quarter. Jeffrey Conway
("Conway"), Rent-Way's former president, CFO, COO and a
director, and Matthew Marini ("Marini"), Rent-Way's former
controller and chief accounting officer, directed the fraudulent
scheme. Conway directed Marini to meet periodic earnings
forecasts that Conway set, and Marini directed lower level
employees to make fraudulent entries to Rent-Way's books and
records. Conway also directed Jeffrey Underwood ("Underwood"),
Rent-Way's former senior vice president in charge of operations,
to defer the recording of certain operating expenses at the end
of fiscal 1999 and 2000. The effect was to inflate falsely and
substantially the Company's financial results.
The defendants are as follows:
Rent-Way is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal
executive offices in Erie, Pennsylvania. Its common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Conway, age 45, was the chief financial officer of Rent-Way
from February 1992 through September 1999 and president and
chief operating officer of Rent-Way from September 1999 until he
resigned in December 2000. Conway also served as a director from
February 2000 until he resigned in December 2000. Conway is a
certified public accountant.
Marini, age 38, was the controller of Rent-Way from October
1995 to December 1999 and the chief accounting officer from
December 1999 until he was terminated in October 2000.
Underwood, age 46, was the senior vice president in charge of
operations overseeing all of Rent-Way's operations from
September 1999 to July 2002.
The Complaint alleges as follows:
Beginning in December 1998, Conway directed Marini to do
whatever was necessary to ensure that the Company met its
earnings guidance but not to tell Conway how he was meeting the
earnings guidance so that Conway could maintain "plausible
deniability" (i.e., the ability to deny direct knowledge of the
misconduct). Beginning in December 1999, Marini told Conway the
details of his fraudulent conduct and continued to discuss with
Conway details of his ongoing efforts to meet the Company's
earnings guidance. Conway condoned and encouraged Marini's
actions.
Marini systematically understated Rent-Way's operating
expenses across many corporate-level accounts and also inflated
the Company's miscellaneous and other income accounts. Marini
accomplished this by directing lower level accounting employees
to make unsupported and false entries to the Company's corporate
general ledger.
Conway also directed Underwood to defer improperly the
recording of certain rental merchandise related losses at the
end of fiscal 1999 and 2000 for the sole purpose of meeting the
Company's earnings targets.
When the fraudulent scheme began to unravel in October 2000,
Conway and Marini took overt steps to conceal the manipulation
from the auditors and from other officers of the Company. For
example, in order to bring a store-level rental merchandise
account into balance with the corporate level general ledger
that had been manipulated, Marini directed an employee to add
back to the store-level point of sale system approximately $16
million in rental merchandise losses that had been written off
in an earlier quarter. When the employee refused, Conway
directed the employee to follow Marini's instructions. Conway
also directed another employee to misrepresent to the CFO the
true nature of the discrepancy in the accounts, and Conway and
Marini later concocted a false explanation of the problem in
order to prevent any further investigation by the CFO.
The Complaint further alleges that in May 2000, Conway
engaged in illegal insider trading by selling 6,500 shares of
Rent-Way stock at a time when he had nonpublic information about
the true financial condition of the Company and the fraudulent
scheme.
The Commission alleges that, as a result of the foregoing,
Rent-Way violated Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1
and 13a-13 promulgated thereunder; Conway and Marini violated
Sections 10(b) and 13b-5 of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5,
13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder, and are also liable as control
persons of Rent-Way under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act for
Rent-Way's violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13; and that
Underwood violated Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rule
13b2-1.
The Commission seeks a Final Judgment (i) permanently
enjoining each defendant from future violations of the
securities laws; (ii) ordering Conway to pay disgorgement plus
prejudgment interest; (iii) imposing civil penalties against
Conway, Marini and Underwood; and (iv) barring Conway and Marini
from serving as an officer or director of a public company.
The Company has consented to the entry of a final judgment
that permanently enjoins the Company from further violations of
the reporting and books and records provisions of the federal
securities law. In determining to accept Rent-Way's settlement
offer, the Commission considered that Rent-Way undertook
remedial actions and cooperated with Commission staff.
Defendant Conway has consented to the entry of a final
judgment that permanently enjoins him from further violations of
the antifraud, reporting and books and records provisions of the
federal securities laws; permanently bars him from serving as an
officer or a director of a public company; and orders him to pay
$129,350 in disgorgement of the loss he avoided on his sale of
Rent-Way stock plus $30,067 in prejudgment interest, and a
$200,000 civil penalty.
Defendant Marini has consented to the entry of a judgment
that permanently enjoins him from further violations of the
antifraud, reporting and books and records provisions of the
federal securities laws, and that permanently bars him from
serving as an officer or a director of a public company. The
amount of any civil penalty that Marini must pay is left open to
a later determination.
Defendant Underwood has consented to the entry of a final
judgment that permanently enjoins him from further violations of
the books and records provisions of the federal securities laws
and orders him to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $25,000.
The offers of settlement by the defendants will be submitted
to the Court for its approval.
The Commission thanks the United States Attorney for the
Western District of Pennsylvania and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation for their assistance to its investigation. In a
separate action, Conway, Marini and Underwood each pleaded
guilty to a criminal information for their respective roles in
the fraudulent scheme.
|
RTO Online is the official channel for Rent-to-Own Industry News and the
only independent source of news for the rent-to-own, rental-purchase,
lease-purchase trade. RTO Online (Rent to Own Online) represents the choice
of the entire RTO Industry for trusted information, as it happens. |
|
Tell us what you think
Rate the article at the top of this page |
|
|
|
|