|
|
|
|
|
Factoids |
| Consequences govern all decision making. |
| Consequences that are Soon, Certain, and Positive,
override all others |
| The benefits of a lower weekly payment are Soon,
Certain, and Positive |
| Getting it today with the least amount of hassle is the
overriding factor |
Having used merchandise on the floor is like gravity...It is an undeniable,
inescapable fact of the Rent to Own universe. While you can't eliminate returns,
you can decrease the idle time of returned merchandise by increasing its value
to potential customers.
Fact: Rent to Own is viewed by most customers as a short term transaction.
There are two types of rent to own consumers. Those that view the
transaction as a week to week, temporary transaction, and those that enter the
transaction with the goal of acquiring ownership. The vast majority view it as a
week to week transaction ...(sorry Senator, but it's true). As a result, the "term"
of an agreement is of less importance than the
renewal payment. In other words, for a reduction in term to induce a
customer to rent a used washer over a new washer at the same payment, the
reduction in term will have to be so large as to offer obvious advantages to the
customer. Unless you have no new merchandise on your floor, those advantages
will have to outweigh the desire to rent something new.
Soon, Certain, and Positive
The most effective consequences are those that are Soon, Certain, and
Positive. To a customer that wants a washer now, the most important thing
is payment. The benefits of a lower weekly payment are Soon, Certain, and
Positive vs. the long term advantages of a shorter rental term resulting in
a lower overall cost to acquire the goods.
Why...you ask? Because, regardless of what the consumer groups say... getting
it today with the least amount of hassle is the overriding factor when consumers
choose rent to own. Civilians reading this article should not assume anything
about the rent to own consumer because of this fact. Americans from all walks of
life make the same choices every day. Leasing a vehicle vs. buying on credit, or
for cash, is a perfect example. Leasing simply costs more. But it offers the
immediate advantages of 'no hassle' and 'lower payments'.
Example
Picture 3 identical Living Room groups. One is new, two are used.
| |
New |
Used |
Used |
| Payment/Term |
18.99 for 78 |
18.99 for 52 |
13.99 for 78 |
| Cost of rental |
1481.22 |
987.48 |
1091.22 |
|
Which has the most immediate advantage?
Which will be seen as the best value by the customer?
How is your bottom line affected by each option? |
There are many ways to improve the odds of a customer renting a used item vs
a new one.
Reduce Term
Leave the payment the same and reduce the term. While this is the best
alternative for you, it offers the least inducement for customers.
Reduce payment
Leave the term the same and reduce the payment. This offers customers the most
immediate advantage.
Reduce payment and term
Reduce both the term of the agreement and the payment. This offers the highest
level of perceived value to all customer types, those that want to acquire
ownership, and those viewing the transaction as temporary..
Another way
If lowering payment and term on used merchandise, doesn't appeal to you, attack
the problem from a different angle. Leave the payment the same, lower the term 1
month for every 2 or 3 months an item has been rented, and offer the first month
at half price. This gives the immediate advantage of less cash needed up front
while maintaining your overall projected income.
Whatever your strategy, make a plan and stick to it. Be consistent. Put your
plan into action, track the results over time, and adjust to meet your goals.
A customers desire to rent new merchandise is inversely proportional to his
desire for a lower payment.
|