Rent to Own Online
"All Rent to Own...All the Time"


| About RTO Online | RTO Tradeshow | Press
#1 Online Destination For the Rent to Own Industry
Trade portal for companies who rent to own furniture, electronics, appliances, custom wheels, jewelry and other home goods.
Rent to Own Online
Rent to Own Tradeshow
Who's Who in rent to own  
The Rent to Own industry's event photo album  
Video podcast interviews with Rent-to-Own industry professionals  
Audio podcast interviews with Rent-to-Own industry professionals  
Rent-to-Own Industry Federal Legislative Guide  
Rent to Own Industry Jobs and Resumes  
Search Rent to Own Online  
Subscribe to
RTO Magazine

E-mail Address :

Manage Subscriptions
RTO Magazine
United States Rent to Own Store Locator  
State Rent to Own Law  
Rent to Own Websites  
Rent to Own Industry Poll  
Editorials By Rent to Own Professionals  
Rent to Own Stocks  
Rent to Own Links  
Rent to Own Industry Events  
Rent to Own Online Archive  
Rent to Own Industry Training  
Advertise on the number one website for rent to own professionals  
Rent to Own Industry Blog  
Rent to Own Chat  
Rent to Own Industry Forum  
Rent to Own Industry Glossary  
National News  
Contact Rent to Own Online  

Site Statistics




Fed Seeks New Disclosure Requirements
RTO Online - The rent to own industry's trade website
Email this page to a friend


Your email address Worthless Helpful I have tears of joy Better than War and Peace

Add your Comments


Back to news

Related Articles
most recent first

House Committee to Markup Consumer Financial Protection Act
California Democrat Cosponsors Rent-to-Own Legislation
Consumer Protection Agency Hearing Set for Wednesday
Wexler Supports Rental Purchase Act
Rent to Own Legislation Gains New Support
Box Clever Won't Go Away; Prosecutors Plan Retrial
Mike McConnell: Policy Matters Ohio Tactics "Soviet"
Editorial: Democrat Health Bill Could Handicap Small Businesses

Multiple Trade Associations Move Industry Forward

New York City Electronics Recycling Law Could Add Millions to Cost
SBA Activity Gives False Impression of Recovery
Rent-A-Center Denies Washington AG Allegations
Washington AG Accuses Rent-a-Center of Harassment
Retailers Welcome CIT Deal to Avoid Bankruptcy
Rental Purchase Act House Co-Sponsorship Breaks 100
Barney Frank to Fast-Track Consumer Protection Agency Bill
Legislation Reduces Small Business Start-up Costs
Association Launches Furniture Industry Advocacy Site
The State of Small Business
New Federal Agency May Have Rent-to-Own Industry Oversight
Landrieu Hosts Small Business Outreach Conference
Missouri Becomes Second State With Full House Support for Rental Purchase Act
Policy Matters Ohio Rent-to-Own Report
Republicans Have Chance to Unseat Wisconsin Gov Doyle
Association Urges Senate to Reject Pay-or-Play Employer Health Care Mandate
Frequently Asked Questions on Identity Theft Rules

Rent-A-Center Makes the RTO Industry's Case

Republicans Move to De-Fund Anti-Rent to Own Group
Rent-A-Center Prepares Strong Case for High Court
Pressure Increasing on Congress to Reject Employee Free Choice Act
Deceptive Practices Could Cost Conn's $40 Million
Revised Furniture Tip-Over Standard Issued
Report: Conservatism is Dead Man Walking
Explanation of Antitrust Concerns Facing Trade Associations
Obama Pledges Support For Small Business
Op-ed: Status of Small Businesses, By Sens. Mary Landrieu and Olympia Snowe
Democrats Slow to Support Rental Purchase Act
Dear Mr. President, Enough
Trans Secretary Ray LaHood to Keynote DC Retail Conference
Small Business Owners Fear Employee Free Choice Act
Will the Rental Purchase Act Become Law?
Obama Popular, Appointees not so much
Arlen Specter Hands Democrats Unbreakable Majority
Giving the Rent-to-Own Industry a Voice
Financial Services Committee Clears Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights
Nationwide Rental Coalition Brings New Blood to Washington DC
Missouri Appliance Sales Tax Holiday Begins
Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Conference Attendee Toolkit
Minnesota's Bachman Supports Rental Purchase Act
Editorial: Bless Me Father For I Might Be A Democrat
New England Rental Dealers Set National Focus
Do-Not-Call Goes Postal; San Francisco Passes Do-Not-Mail Resolution
Zogby; Business Leaders Not Happy with Obama's First 60 Days
Text of Rental Purchase Act Released
Electronics Industry to Congress "No More DTV Transition Delays"
Landrieu Schumer Team Up; Call for Small Business Advocate
CEA; Employee Free Choice Act Harmful
Northeast Rental Dealers to Meet March 31
Obama Pledges $15 Billion to Unlock Commercial Credit
RTO Act Supporter Landrieu Receives Economic Development Award
Letter to the Editor; Employee Free Choice Act Gives Workers a Voice
Franchise Association Says Employee Free Choice Act Bad for Business
RNC Releases Jim Cramer Response To The White House
Barney Frank Vows to Continue Financial Reform Agenda
Rental Association Sees Stimulus as Welcome Relief
Anti Rent-to-Own Group Nominated for New York Times Award
Americans File Taxes Earlier; Retailers Urged to plan Early Promotions

Registration Deadline for Free Rooms at Legislative Conference Nears

Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Action Database Update
IRS Issues Updated Withholding Tables
Association Urges Congress To Overturn Ban On Same-As-Cash
Stimulus Bill Expands Small Business Expensing Limits
Theft of Leased Property Bill Introduced in Missouri Assembly
Georgia Seeks to Impose Strict Security for Online Rent-to-Own
Groundwork Laid for Consumer Rental Purchase Act of 2009
Majority of Voters Oppose Obama Economic Recovery Plan
Stimulus Not Enough; Retailers Call for National Sales Tax Holidays
Fed Survey; Commercial Credit Remains Tight
Provision to Expand Lawsuits Include in Stimulus Package
Freddie Mac to Offer Rent-to-Own Option on Foreclosed Homes
APRO Continues Tradeshow Co-Location Debate
APRO Calls On President to Follow State Example in RTO Regulation
NY Mayor Bloomberg Announces Underbanked Savings Program
Louisiana Rental Dealers to Attend New Orleans NRC Event
Ralph Nader Calls on Obama to Strengthen Consumer Protections
NRC and State RTO Association Meeting Scheduled for March
New York City Council Sets Rent-to-Own Hearing
Preemption Top Concern for Attorneys General
Rental-Purchase Act Supporter Hensarling Appointed Ranking Member of Key Subcommittee
Recipe for Disaster; 260 Democrats and One Can of Whoop-Ass
RTO Supporter Senator Landrieu Shakes Up Staff
Third of 111th Congress Freshman Own Small Businesses
Association Urges Obama to Move Quickly on Stimulus Package
Office of Thrift Supervision Issues Final Credit Card Rule
Association Calls for Federal Action on Rent-to-Own Law
RTO Industry Supporter Mary Landrieu to Chair Senate Committee
New York Rent-to-Own Protests Continue; Habitat Exec Clarifies Remarks
New England Rental Dealers Elect Officers; 4 New Podcasts
Massachusetts Court to Hear Rent-A-Center Motion to Dismiss $5 Million Suit
Rent-to-Own Industry Supporter Saxby Chambliss Runnoff Today
NRC Announces Tri-state Rental Dealer Association
Nationwide Rental Coalition Organizes Connecticut Trade Association
Massachusetts Rent-to-Own Dealers Form Trade Association
Paul Davis of Nation's Rent-to-Own Enters Local California Politics
Election Night Poll; 77 Percent of Democrats Say Frivolous Lawsuits Hurt Economy

From English as Official Language to Payday Loans; Citizen Ballot Initiatives On the Rise

Advance America CEO "Deeply Troubled"; Comments on Ohio Payday Lending Law
U.S. Companies Preparing for Rise in Litigation Following Two Years of Declines
Nationwide Southwest Sponsors RTO Industry Pros at Texas Governor's Mansion
RTO Industry Supporter Landrieu Poised for Come From Behind Victory
Experts Fear Democratic Congress Will Pass Lawsuit-Expanding Provisions
Schumer Proposes Small Business Stimulus Package; NRF Asks Congress for Another Round of Checks
Nationwide Rental Coalition Seeks Support From NY Senator Hillary Clinton
Texas Democrat Announces Support of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Civil Rights Commission Report; U.S. Voter Fraud Requires Immediate Attention
Aaron's Announces Support for Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Obama Widens Lead Over McCain; Obama 48%, McCain 39%
Fed Moves to Free Up Commercial Credit; Will Purchase Commercial Paper
NAAG Issues National Top 10 List Of Consumer Complaints

NRF Says U.S. in "Profound Economic Crisis"; Urges Senate Action

California Rep Becomes 100th Supporter of Rental Purchase Act
Little Known Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Facts
Ranking Ways and Means Republican Supports Rental-Purchase Act
Rent-to-Own Transaction Favored in Ralph Nader's 10-Point Plan
Nationwide Rental Coalition Legislative Conference Changes Venue to Accommodate Larger Turnout
Billions Spent Preparing for Digital Transition Deadline; Transition Trivia
NCPA Endorses Sarah Palin as Republican Vice Presidential Nominee
Small Business Not Politically Active; One Quarter Donate to Campaigns
New Poll Shows RTO Sponsor Landrieu Over Kennedy by 16 Points
RentDirect Covering Cost of First 200 Legislative Conference Registrants
RTO Champ Landrieu Falls Behind Challenger Kennedy
Ohio Governor Strickland Offers Mandatory Sick Leave Compromise
UK Rent to Own Company Launches Records Dumping Inquiry
Senator Lieberman: Rent to Own "Sad Reality"
Barney Frank, Maxine Waters Urge Voluntary Halt to Foreclosures
States Extend Sales Tax Holidays to Appliances
The Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Guide
The Do Not Call List and You
Republican Kay Granger Backs Rental Purchase Agreement Act
RentDirect Launches Rent-to-Own Industry Trade Association
Congressional Approval Rating at All-Time Low
SEMA Elects New Board
Legal Duties of Nonprofit Board Members
IRS Approves 17 Percent Increase in Business Mileage Deduction
Federal Reserve Seeking Nominations for Consumer Council
Kanjorski to Back Rental Purchase Agreement Act
UK RTO BoxClever Banker Acquitted
RentDirect Developing Legislative Action Alternative to APRO
Congress Introduces Home Office Deduction Simplification Act
Lawmakers Urged to Vote No on Rent-to-Own Amendment
Senator Schumer; Color Coded
Nationwide Pulls APRO Financial Support Over Ethical Concerns
Nationwide Responds To APRO TRIB Alliance
Can Rent to Own Association Remain Independent?
New Jersey Rent to Own Bill Scheduled For Hearing
Senate Passes Lawsuit Protection Over Credit Card Receipts
House Passes Law Making it Easier to Remodel Retail Stores
Check 'n Go Pays $220,000 Settlement After Customer Records Found In Dumpster
What's Next For Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Clinton Overtakes Obama With Democrats Nationally
National Governors Association Presses Congress For Unemployment Extension
SBA Recommends Alternatives to Social Security No-Match Rule
West Virginia, Louisiana Worst State Lawsuit Climates
Videocast With Jeff Everson, Regional Representative for Senator Mary Landrieu
Chairman Barney Frank Call for GAO Study on Fair Lending Enforcement
Congressional Brain Trust Sponsors Rent to Own Legislation
Senior Republicans Announce Support of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
CEA Tells Congress Consumer Education on Digital Transition Working
Drive to Simplify IRS Home Office Deduction Gaining Steam
Gas Prices High Enough; Americans Tell Congress No More Gas Taxes
NHTSA's Proposed Tire Registry Rule Gets SBA Support
Seven Term Iowa Republican Tom Latham Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
One Fifth of U.S. Households Will Spend Stimulus Package Funds on Consumer Electronics
Elliot Spitzer To Resign; Ethics King Involved In Prostitution Ring
Freshman New Yorker Pushes Rental Purchase Agreement Act Cosponsors Over 80; Senate Stalled at 21
Indiana Blue Dog Baron Hill First Indiana Rep to Support Rental Purchase Agreement Act of 2007
Ohio Association Strongly Opposes Mandatory Paid Sick Leave Act
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gets Seven New Cosponsors
Ralph Nader Seeks To Influence Obama, Clinton on Rent-to-Own, Payday
Iowa Rent to Own Bill Copies West Virginia; DOA in Iowa House
Indiana Senate Takes First Look At Rent-to-Own Property Legislation
Eleven Term Tennessee Republican John Duncan Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Republican Trio LaTourette, Aderholt, King Cosponsor Rental Purchase Agreement Act
National Federation of Independent Business Endorses Widener For Ohio Senate
Missouri Reps Akin and Graves Support Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Consumers Can Sue Debt Collector, Federal Court Rules
Business Activity Tax Simplification Act (BATSA) Introduced in House
New Jersey Rent-to-own Bill Introduced With Ten Co-sponsors
Iowa Senate Committee Votes To Modify Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Law
Family And Medical Leave Act Extended To Cover Members Of Armed Services
Barack Obama Backs Plan To Cap Payday Loans
Congressman Barney Frank's Rookie Mistake
State of the Union Rated Poor by 4 Out of 5 Americans
National Taxpayer Advocate To IRS Calls For Simplified Home Office Deduction
Fed Chairman Bernanke Voices Inflation Concerns
TARA Lobbyist Terral Smith Named Texas House Speaker Chief of Staff
Third Rent to Own Industry Supporter In Six Months Resigns From Congress; Rep Richard Baker Resigns To Head Association
Clinton, Edwards, Obama Pander To Consumer Activists
Roger Wicker To Replace Retiring Trent Lott In U.S. Senate
Oregon Check Cashing Limits Take Effect Today
Minimum Wage Hikes Will Cause Job Loss
House Small Business Committee Unanimously Approves Regulatory Improvement Act; Changes Will Reduce the Regulatory Burden on Small Firms
Fed Cuts Prime Rate; Barney Frank, "It's Not Enough"
Pennsylvania Democrat Holden Supports Pro Rent to Own Industry Bill
Rent to Own Industry Supporter Trent Lott To Resign From Senate
Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Senate Cosponsor At 21
Providence Rhode Island Mayor's Task Force Recommends Allowing City To Ban Rent to Own And Other Services
New York State Rental Dealers To Combat Negative Rent to Own Industry Perceptions
Fed Updates Consumer Lease Disclosure Requirements
Seven Term Mississippi Representative Roger Wicker Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Cosponsor Count at 61
Message To Attorneys General, Stop Threatening Business With Criminal Prosecution To Force Settlements
Podcast on the Ramifications of Congress' Delay In Passing the Alternative Minimum Tax Patch
Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Senate Cosponsor Count Hits 20
Congress to Hold Hearing on Organized Retail Crime
No-Match Letters And You; Groups Continue Fight Against Burdensome Citizenship Rules
Ohio Freshman Representative Zachary Space Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Cosponsor Count Hits 60
North Carolina Blue Dog Democrat McIntyre Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
New York Democrat Representative Clarke Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Presidential Candidates Failing To Connect; Hillary Clinton Generates the Most Positive and Negative Response
Rent-A-Center Rescues Vandalized Buffalo, New York Club; Buffalo Mayor Brown Recognizes RAC For Community Involvement
National Governors Association Wants Internet Tax
Interview With Gloria Homeier-Schwein, Owner, A Full House Rentals
Interview With Express Rentals Owner Jean-Guy Poulin
North Carolina Representative Hayes Cosponsors Rental Purchase Agreement Act For First Time; House Count at 57, Senate 19
Poll; People Twice As Likely To Trust Bloggers Than Congress or the Media
Barack Obama Generates More Unique Website Visitors Than Top Three Republicans Combined; Thompson Leads Among Republicans
Two Southern Republicans Cosponsor Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Count at 55, Senate 18
Poll Shows Conservatives Favor Fred Thompson Over Next Closest Republican 2-1 Even Before Announcement
Federal Reserve To Hold Underbanked Consumer Conference; BAI To Host Webinar on Tools for Unbanked Consumers
Ohio Representative Pryce Announces Retirement From Congress
New York Legislature Galvanizes Rental Dealers; Legislative Conference Set For January
Association Seeks Administrative Changes To National Do Not Call Registry
New Democrat Bobby Etheridge (NC) 50th Cosponsor to Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Former Blue-Dog Representative Ralph Hall Cosponsors Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Minimum Wage Increases To $5.85 Today
California Supreme Court Rules Against Frivolous Lawsuits
Tennessee Governor Signs Regulatory Flexibility Law; Requires Lawmakers To Consider Legislative Impact On Small Business
Just Say No To Government-Mandated Paid Sick Leave
Texas Governor Signs Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Provisions
Barack Obama Narrows Hillary Clinton's Lead Among Democrats; Democrats Lead Republicans Overall By 8 Points
New Jersey Democrats Go After RTO Homes
Presidential Politics; Rudy Giuliani's Lead Shrinks As Fred Thompson Moves Solidly Into Second Place In GOP Race
Direct Comparison Of Rental Purchase Agreement Act and Rent to Own Reform Act
House Financial Services Committee Schedules Hearing On Future of Consumer Protection
Schumer To Introduce Rent to Own Legislation
Recycling Tax Proposed For Consumer Electronics; Consumers To Pay At Point of Sale
Fed Seeks New Disclosure Requirements
Lawsuits Drain Economy, Alter Business Decisions; U.S. Chamber: 'Broken Lawsuit System' Hurts Small Businesses
Small Business Lending Bill Clears Committee
Hillary Clinton Widens Lead Over Barack Obama; Gore, Edwards Show No Signs Of Success
Barney Frank, John Dingell Call For Federal Regulation Of Payday Lending And Other Financial Services
Association Calls On Congress To Pass H.R. 1201, the Fair Use Act
Federal Reserve To Begin Comprehensive Study Of The Economic Condition Of American Families
Retailers Express Concerns Over Identity Theft Act of 2007
Georgia Senator Isakson Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
SBA Counsel Recommends Sarbanes-Oxley Relief
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gains 10 Cosponsors
Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act; HR 1767
Politics On the Web; Younger Audiences Prefer Barack Obama, The Money Prefers Hillary
House Financial Services Committee Passes Shareholders Vote on Executive Compensation Act
Association Supports Federal Trade Commission's Charges Against Mystery Shopping Service
More States Consider Small Business Regulatory Flexibility
FCC Declines To Set Mandatory Conversion Date For Digital Radio
Government Interference in Companies' Salary Policy Sets Dangerous Precedent
Rent to Own Property Tax Amendment Reported Favorably Out Of Committee
Arkansas Law Gives Small Business Owners A Voice In The State Regulatory Process
Democrat Hillary Clinton Takes Early Lead in Online Race to the White House; Double The Traffic of Three Top Republicans Combined
Democrats Vote to Suspend Basic Guarantees of Democracy in Union Elections
Rent to Own Property Tax Amendment Scheduled For Public Hearing
Texas State Senator Carona To Re-introduce TARA Supported Constitutional Amendment
New York Introduces Bill To Ban Spinner Rims
Report; Small Business Startups Drive State Economies
Texas Rental Dealers Wrap Legislative Conference; Solid Start To 80th Session
Senate Approves Minimum Wage Hike
New York Democrat and PIRG Hero Maloney To Chair House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit
Texas Democrat Harold Dutton Introduces Rent to Own Price Cap
Rent To Own Industry Execs Set Legislative Agenda At Dallas Conference
It Begins; New York City Councilmen Lay Groundwork For Schumer's Anti RTO Legislation
West Virginia Rental Dealers Association Meeting Planned For March
Coalition Formed To Fight Government Attempts to Limit Financial Services To Low and Moderate Income Consumers
National Black Caucus of State Legislators Claims Credit Scores Used to Deny African-Americans Access to Financial Services
Text of Proposed New York Rental Purchase Legislation; Links to New York Legislators
APRO Hosts Legislative Conference; All North American Rent to Own Companies Urged to Attend
Transcript of Remarks by Chairman Barney Frank on Wages at the National Press Club
Incoming House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank to Address the National Press Club; 'Waging War on Wages'
Rent to Own Legislation 101; A Real World Guide To Communicating With Legislators
Politics; 50 Percent of Democrats Want Hillary Nominated; 32 Percent Say Obama
Lawmakers Vote to Maintain Payday Lending in Virginia
FiSCA Weighs In On Center For Responsible Lending Payday Loan Report; Study Misrepresents Data Regarding Rollovers, Fails To Address Hi-Cost Alternatives
Video Gaming Association Lawsuit Successful; Michigan To Pay Over $180,000 In Legal Fees
Association Trashes Center For Responsible Lending Payday Loan Report; Report Misrepresents Industry
Gallup Poll; Nine of Ten Small Business Owners Will Vote In Upcoming Congressional Elections
Association Backs Digital Freedom Campaign
Pennsylvania Uses $20 Million Taxpayer Dollars For Government Funded Payday Loan Program
Top 10 Reasons To Vote Republican In the Upcoming Election
Complete Text Of Schumer's Rent to Own Protection Act
U.S. Labor Department Launches Web site to Help Employers Comply with Health Benefit Laws
Senator Chuck Schumer; The Most Trusted Man In Congress
Senate Banking Committee To Hear Testimony On DOD Payday Lending, Rent to Own Report
Legislative; Study Claims Term Limits At Heart Of Uncivil Legislatures
New Jersey Supremes Rule Against Class Action Waivers In Binding Arbitration Clause
Schumer's Office Pushing Bogus Rent to Own Report
Retailers Urge Trading Status For Vietnam; Move Could Increase Furniture Imports
Proposed Legislation Could Raise Cost Of Electronics; Analog Hole Legislation is a Bad Solution in Search of a Problem
Minnesota Attempts Bill To Fine Stores, Underage Kids For Renting M Rated Games; Association Seeks to have Law Declared Unconstitutional
Michigan Car Dealer Fined For Violations Of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Rental Purchase Amendment Fails In Committee
El Paso Rental Dealer Hosts Bi-Partisan Luncheon For Key Texas Representative
Governors Oppose Business Activity Tax Simplification Act; Say Legislation is an Intrusion into States’ Authority
Rent A Center; New Jersey Ruling Not Expected To Affect Other States
New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Perez v. Rent-A-Center; Says Rent to Own Agreements "Similar" to Retail Sales
Rental Purchase Act Passes Wisconsin Assembly; Bill Goes To Governor
Reminder; Anti Business Bill On New York Judiciary Committee Agenda
U.S. Senate Banking Committee Hearing On Federal Rent To Own Law "As Expected"; Chairman wants action within 30 days as part of regulatory relief
New Jersey Assembly Committee Overwhelmingly Approves Rental Purchase Act; Bill Moves Forward
Rental Purchase Act Scheduled For Hearing In New Jersey Assembly; Act Introduced In Senate
Florida Representative Tom Feeney Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
The Financial Data Protection Act of 2005 Introduced; Would Require Tighter Store Level Security
Wisconsin Moves One Step Closer To Mainstream Rental Purchase Legislation
Tennessee Duo Co-Sponsor Rental Purchase Act
Wisconsin Legislators To Debate Rent to Own Law
Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Flurry Of Support Follows Successful Committee Hearing
Senate Hearing Set For Rental Purchase Act; House Co-Sponsor Count Hits 30
New Jersey RTO Bill Hearing Scheduled
Eight More Legislators Endorse Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Former HUD Secretary Endorses Rental Purchase Agreement Act
House Overwhelmingly Approves Business Checking Freedom Act of 2005; 424-1
Bad Policy Starts Small; Alabama Town Proposes Tax On Rent to Own Payments
Long Battle To Raise Maximum Late Fees Comes To Successful Conclusion In Texas
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gets Flurry Of Support
Texas House To Vote On Rent To Own Late Fee Bill
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gains 3 Key Co-Sponsors
Rent To Own Agreement History Can Benefit Consumers; House Subcommittee To Hold Hearing Next Week
North Dakota Democrat Supports Rental Purchase Act
RTO Amendment Clears Texas House; Passes Unanimously
New Jersey Rent to Own Bill Scheduled For Hearing This Week
U.S. House Approves Resolution Promoting Small Business Bill of Rights
Bedding And Late Fee Bills Progressing In Texas Legislature
Rent to Own Coalition Gains Cosponsors; Holds 50 Meetings With Legislators
RTO Legislative Conference Kicks Off In DC
Rent A Center Class Action Dismissed In Arkansas
Rental Purchase Disclosure Bill Introduced In House of Representatives
The Coalition for Fair Rental Regulations Invites RTO Dealers To Join Effort; Legislative Conference Set For April
Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act of 2005 Introduced In Senate
Rent To Own Legislation Introduced In New Jersey


There is systematic evidence that in practice, changes in disclosure affect both consumer and supplier behavior in a number of consumer product markets.
Randall S. Kroszner, Governor, Federal Reserve

Photo of Randall S. Kroszner
Federal Reserve Governor Randall S. Kroszner discussed plans to re-vamp credit disclosure requirements based on real-world consumer feedback.

In a speech yesterday at the George Washington University School of Business, Financial Services Research Program Policy Forum in Washington, D.C., Federal Reserve Governor Randall S. Kroszner discussed plans to re-vamp credit disclosure requirements based on real-world consumer feedback.

advertise here

Kroszner said the Fed is looking for ways to make financial services disclosures more useful to average consumers. Regulators are slowly coming to accept a fact the rent to own industry has known for decades; Consumers understand total dollars far better than APR. Rental purchase agreements typically have the most clear and concise disclosures of any financial transaction.

The Fed is seeking comment on revised disclosure requirements for all types of transactions, but the new rules will rely heavily on real consumers of financial services giving real feedback on what makes a disclosure meaningful.

In 1968, Congress passed the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), which significantly changed a number of consumer credit disclosure practices. There have been incremental changes to TILA since then, but this may be the first major overhaul in many years.

Read the entire speech by Governor Randall S. Kroszner below:

Remarks by Governor Randall S. Kroszner
At the George Washington University School of Business, Financial Services Research Program Policy Forum, Washington, D.C.
May 23, 2007
Creating More Effective Consumer Credit Disclosures

Information is critical to the effective functioning of markets. A core principle of economics is that markets are more competitive, and therefore more efficient, when accurate information is available to both consumers and suppliers. When information on alternatives is readily available, product offerings will have to meet customers’ demands and offering prices will have to reflect those of market competitors.1 In addition, information helps individual consumers by improving their ability to compare products and to choose those that will help them meet their personal goals.

These arguments are not just theoretical. There is systematic evidence that in practice, changes in disclosure affect both consumer and supplier behavior in a number of consumer product markets. In 1968, Congress passed the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), which significantly changed a number of consumer credit disclosure practices. For example, it required that creditors disclose an “annual percentage rate.” These disclosures are generally believed to have improved competition and helped individual consumers.

Today, we face the challenge of ensuring that disclosures for consumer credit remain effective. To be effective, disclosures must give consumers information about credit pricing at a time when it is relevant, and in language consumers can easily understand. The information must also be in a format that allows consumers to pick out and use the information that is most important to them. Effective disclosures give consumers information they notice, understand, and can use. Better credit disclosure permits better-informed credit decisions and, hence, more effective competition among credit card issuers. In a nutshell, effective disclosure empowers consumers and enhances competition.

The Federal Reserve Board has recently undertaken an innovative approach to improve the effectiveness of disclosure--namely, surveying and responding to consumers through consumer testing. Having taught at a business school for many years, I am well aware of the types of consumer testing that firms have long employed: surveys, focus groups, and so-called “mall intercepts” in which shoppers are interviewed at random. Systematically using such techniques to improve the effectiveness of disclosure requirements set out in the regulations of the Federal Reserve and other financial regulators, is, however, relatively novel.

Consumer testing can help the Federal Reserve address the considerable challenge of making disclosures more effective. Consumers increasingly face more-diverse and more-complex financial products, including nontraditional mortgages and credit cards with multiple features. Given this complexity, we have to be mindful of the dangers of information overload. We must seek to carry out the responsibilities Congress has given us to design disclosures that are not only accurate, but also clear and simple enough that they are meaningful and useful to consumers.

In other words, pages and pages of fine print may provide comprehensive descriptions that lawyers might love but that consumers find confusing, or, worse, useless. We need to translate legalese into something consumers can use. This requires the Board to make judgments about which credit terms are most important to highlight and which could be eliminated. However, we plan to make these judgments with the benefit of feedback from actual consumers gathered through surveys and testing. We recently completed several rounds of consumer testing for credit card disclosures, and that testing was critical to our effort to redesign and, I believe, dramatically improve those disclosures.

Just this morning, the Board took a major step toward making credit disclosure more effective, by voting to seek public comment on proposed revisions to the Board’s Regulation Z, which implements the Truth In Lending Act--revisions that will improve credit card disclosures. I will share with you some of the results of our consumer testing, how they influenced our newly issued proposal concerning credit card disclosures, and how consumer testing will influence future proposals for improvements of mortgage loan disclosures.

The Board’s Recent Actions Related to Mortgage Loan Disclosures
First, however, I want to note that the Board has already taken some steps to improve disclosures concerning mortgages, including subprime mortgages, which is the topic of this forum. Last summer, the Board held a series of four public hearings on home-equity lending, where we gathered views on the impact of federal and state predatory lending laws and on the adequacy of mortgage disclosures, particularly those concerning nontraditional mortgage products. Following those hearings, the Board revised the consumer handbook that creditors are required to provide with applications for adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs. As you well know, a substantial majority of recent subprime mortgage originations have been ARMs. The revised handbook gives consumers a better explanation of the features and risks of nontraditional ARMs, especially “payment shock” and the risk of increasing loan balances, also known as “negative amortization.”

The Board will be holding a fifth hearing on June 14, here in Washington, D.C., and I will chair that meeting. We will focus on how the Board might use its rulemaking authority under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, or HOEPA, to address concerns about abusive mortgage lending practices.

The purpose of the hearing is to gather information to evaluate how the Federal Reserve can prevent predatory lending in a way that also preserves incentives for responsible lenders. A robust and responsible subprime mortgage market benefits consumers by allowing borrowers with non-prime or limited credit histories to become homeowners, access the equity in their homes, or have the flexibility to refinance their loans as needed. Following the hearing, we will consider whether there are lending practices that should be prohibited under HOEPA. The Federal Reserve will do all that it can to prevent fraud and abusive mortgage lending practices. However, any new rules should be drawn clearly to avoid creating legal or regulatory uncertainty that could have the unintended consequence of restricting consumers' access to responsible subprime credit.

As I mentioned earlier, effective disclosure can make markets more competitive and weed out abuse. Therefore, we will also consider how mortgage disclosures can be improved to ensure a robust subprime market and responsible subprime lending. In fact, the Board is conducting a comprehensive review of all Truth in Lending Act disclosures. As the Board reviews mortgage disclosures, it will consider a variety of recent suggestions. For example, given the large volume of documents presented to consumers at mortgage loan closings, the Board will consider whether creditors should be required to provide disclosures for home-refinance loans and home-equity loans within three days of application instead of at consummation, as currently required for home-purchase loans. The Board will also review the requirements concerning advertisements, to ensure that when lenders promote low initial rates and low monthly payments they also adequately disclose the limits of those low rates and payments and the potential payment shock. Our review of mortgage disclosures is now under way.

I would now like to turn to the initial phase of the Board’s review of credit disclosures, which has focused on credit cards and other revolving credit accounts. The substantial investment we have made in developing and testing revised credit card disclosures has given us insights that will surely contribute to our ability to make mortgage disclosures more effective.

The Challenges of Disclosing Credit Card Costs
In our effort to create more effective credit card disclosures, we face several challenges. First, disclosing the cost of revolving credit to facilitate consumer shopping is inherently challenging because key variables are not known in advance, such as the amount of credit that the consumer will use and the timing and amount of the consumer’s payments. Creditors’ solicitations disclose only a nominal APR based on the periodic interest rate, and they list any fees separately. Related variables, such as the grace period and balance calculation method, also have to be explained. On periodic billing statements, an “effective APR” can be disclosed after the credit is extended, but even then assumptions must be made about the consumer’s payments. For example, the effective APR assumes that transaction fees are amortized over one billing cycle, regardless of how long the credit is actually outstanding.

The increasing complexity and diversity of credit card features and pricing present a second challenge. Because creditors use risk-based pricing, their solicitations might disclose a range of possible rates for which the consumer could qualify. Creditors discount their initial interest rates, sometimes deeply. While competing on the initial rate, creditors compensate with “back-end” pricing.4 Temporary introductory rates are followed by a higher rate, and penalty rates and fees have increased and are now easier to trigger. Consumers might not focus on costs that are contingent on future events, and it can be challenging to explain clearly how these contingencies can increase consumers’ costs.

A third major challenge is crafting disclosure rules that are, on the one hand, clear and specific enough to facilitate compliance and promote consistency among creditors but, on the other hand, flexible enough to accommodate market developments as products and pricing continue to change. We have a responsibility to avoid undue burdens that would hinder innovation and raise costs without producing sufficient offsetting benefits in the credit card market.

Faced with these developments, the Board’s challenge is to determine what information should be highlighted for consumers. How much information is enough, and how much is too much? How can we encourage plainer language, recognizing that there may be a trade-off between simplicity and accuracy? What formats work best in presenting the information? When is the best time to present information so it will be most relevant and useful to consumers? How can we craft disclosure requirements that are flexible enough to accommodate innovation and change and to enhance competition?

Using Consumer Testing to Improve Credit Card Disclosures: Highlights of the Proposal and Lessons Learned
Although the Board has used consumer focus groups in the past, this is the first time that we have conducted extensive, in-depth interviews with individual consumers to study the effectiveness of disclosures. The first step was using both focus groups and one-on-one interviews to evaluate how well consumers understand and use the current credit card disclosures. With a consultant’s help, we then redesigned the disclosures and conducted more one-on-one interviews using the revised formats. We went through this process several times, each time adjusting our designs to incorporate the lessons learned. We plan to follow the same testing process with mortgage disclosures. In addition, there were other sources of information, such as public comment letters and informal input from industry and consumer groups, discussions by the Board’s Consumer Advisory Council, a study by the Government Accountability Office, and data from consumer surveys.

As I noted earlier, our task is to take a complex credit product and design disclosures that can explain the terms not only accurately but also clearly enough to be meaningful and useful to consumers--all while enhancing, not stifling, competition and innovation. I will briefly describe the highlights of the proposal issued by the Board this morning and use them to illustrate some general lessons we have learned about making disclosure more effective for consumers.

First, we learned firsthand what information consumers find useful when making credit decisions and what information they ignore. Second, we learned what information consumers comprehend and what information they do not. Third, we saw the impact that different formats and presentation can have on consumers’ ability to notice and use the information.

The first significant lesson from our consumer testing was that there are some disclosures that consumers just do not find useful. Most participants acknowledged that they do not read the cardholder agreements that contain their account-opening disclosures because they are often written in small print and dense prose. At the same time, they wanted some sort of disclosure they could use, before opening an account, to confirm that the terms are what they expect. Participants also said that often they do not carefully read their change-in-terms notices because they are frustrated by the format and technical language.

With this information in hand, we explored how we could improve the disclosures to change consumer behavior. Under the proposed rules, when an account is opened, the consumer would receive a summary of the credit agreement in the form of a table, which they can compare with the original solicitation.

Creditors would also have to provide a disclosure table with their change-in-terms notices, to summarize the changes. In our tests, such a table was very effective in making the change-in-terms notice more usable, and consumers were more likely to correctly identify the changes to the terms of their accounts. The Board’s proposal also would require creditors to give consumers more advance notice before increasing the interest rate or making changes to other key terms. Creditors would have to send a notice to consumers 45 days in advance of a rate increase, compared with the current 15 days. The intent is to give consumers more time to make other credit arrangements, if necessary, before the higher rate becomes effective. The Board is expressly seeking comment on whether 45 days is the appropriate amount of time.

The second lesson learned from our consumer testing was which disclosures consumers comprehend and which they do not. Before deciding that the core information was not useful, we explored other ways to explain complex information and to improve consumers’ understanding. We explored whether consumers would benefit from using different terminology or whether particular terms need to be accompanied by an explanation. This is a particular challenge in the case of the term “effective APR.” We experimented with terminology and explanatory language as well as formats. The proposed changes for disclosing the effective APR have shown promise, but this is an area where we will be conducting additional consumer testing.

The test participants also often did not correctly understand what creditors meant by the term “fixed rate.” They equated this with the fixed rate on their mortgage. Thus, under the proposed rules we would allow creditors to describe their rates as “fixed” only if there is a specified period during which the rate cannot be increased for any reason. If no period is specified, the term “fixed” could be used only if the rate cannot increase while the credit plan is open.

Consumers in our tests also did not understand the term “default APR.” We would therefore require creditors to refer to the “penalty APR” rather than the “default APR,” which improved consumer understanding in our tests. Consumers also did not consistently understand the term “grace period,” which is significant considering the cost implications of not paying on time. Based on language we tested with consumers, we are proposing to add an explanation of the term.

The third lesson of our consumer testing was the impact that different formats and presentation can have on consumers’ ability to notice and use the information. Our testing confirmed that one of the most effective ways to present credit card disclosures is in the table provided with solicitations, commonly known as the “Schumer box.” Although this table is effective, we were nevertheless able to use the one-on-one interviews to improve both the content and format. For example, when a creditor uses risk-based pricing, solicitations may show a range of rates, and many test participants had trouble understanding how a card issuer would select an initial APR. We are therefore proposing to add a simple explanation that consumers’ initial rate is based on their creditworthiness. We also reformatted the Schumer box into two major sections, to separate information about rates from the information about fees. This seemed to enhance consumers’ understanding and improve the usability of the disclosures.

In addition, disclosures inside the Schumer box were more readily noticed than when the same information was placed just beneath it. We propose to move information that was more important to consumers--such as the circumstances that trigger a penalty APR--inside the Schumer box. The creditor’s balance-calculation method, however, was removed and located beneath the Schumer box, because our testing showed that consumers do not use the information to shop.

A related finding concerning format is that regrouping information in the Schumer box improved consumers’ ability to use the disclosures. Specifically, we found that grouping certain information together on periodic statements made it easier to understand. For example, consumers more easily determined the number and amount of fees when they were itemized, grouped together, and totaled. So the revised rules would require creditors to locate the fees and interest charges in one place on the statement. Fees would have to be grouped together with a total dollar amount instead of listed chronologically with purchase transactions, as they are today. Interest charges would also be grouped together, with a total dollar amount.

Finally, most consumers said that they throw away any inserts included with their periodic statement, including any inserts that describe changes to their account terms. To alert consumers to the significance of the insert, creditors that insert a change-in-terms notice with the periodic statement would have to summarize the changes on the front of the periodic statement rather than on the insert.

Similar Challenges in Improving Mortgage Disclosures
As I mentioned earlier, the Board also plans to conduct consumer testing as part of its review of mortgage disclosures. Like credit cards, mortgage products have become more diverse and more complex. In some cases, creditors are using pricing strategies similar to those used for credit cards, for example, offering customers discounted introductory rates that will be replaced in a short time by a much higher rate, often a variable rate. Of course there is an inherent difficulty in adjustable-rate mortgage disclosures because future interest rate changes are not known. Consumer testing is needed to determine whether consumers would find disclosure of the maximum rate and a worst-case payment example useful, given that these might not occur for several years or more and that the consumer’s own financial circumstances may change.

The wider marketing of payment-option mortgages presents another challenge. Consumers have the choice of making low minimum monthly payments that increase the overall cost of the credit and may ultimately lead to longer amortization periods. Just as with credit cards, however, disclosing a consumer’s repayment obligation and the cost of the credit is more complex when there are unknowns--such as the rate, the amount of the consumer’s monthly payment, and the possibility of negative amortization. When the Board reviews mortgage disclosures, it will consider these developments and conduct consumer testing to determine how the features and risks of today’s mortgage products can be communicated effectively.

The Board’s Upcoming Hearing on Mortgage Lending Practices
As I mentioned earlier, in June the Board will be conducting another public hearing on mortgage lending, which will focus on how the Board might use its rulemaking authority to prevent abusive lending. Some of these concerns may call for more-effective disclosures.

Last year, the federal agencies that supervise depository institutions issued guidance on nontraditional mortgage products, and they recently proposed similar guidance for subprime mortgages. Both guidance statements discuss underwriting practices as well as the need for lenders to give consumers more complete and balanced information while they are still shopping for a mortgage, before they apply for the loan.

Prepayment penalties as well the use of “stated-income” or “low-doc” loans will also be discussed at the upcoming hearing. We will hear arguments about such practices and consider whether disclosures can be made more effective to adequately inform consumers about how penalty clauses operate and the implications of not documenting their income.

In fulfilling its responsibility to protect consumers, the Federal Reserve will do all that it can to prevent fraudulent and abusive mortgage lending practices. Because information is critical to more competitive, and thus more efficient, markets, effective disclosure also has the capacity to weed out abuses. Consumers who do not have accurate information and an understanding of what that information means will have difficulty choosing among competing products and making decisions that are in their best interest. This is true in both credit card and mortgage markets. Accordingly, we will consider how mortgage disclosures can be more effective and empower consumers to make better-informed decisions and achieve their financial goals. Better-informed consumers will strengthen market competition. The Federal Reserve also will consider how we might use our rulemaking authority to address predatory practices without restricting consumers' access to responsible subprime credit.

By using consumer testing systematically, the Federal Reserve is taking an innovative approach to revising its regulations and improving the effectiveness of disclosures. We are finding that it is tremendously beneficial to listen to consumers so that we can learn more about how they use information and how we can simplify disclosures and enhance consumers’ understanding. Surely, the lessons we have already learned from consumer testing for credit cards will also help us improve mortgage disclosures and contribute to a more robust, competitive, and responsible subprime market.



RTO Online is the official channel for Rent-to-Own Industry News and the only independent source of news for the rent-to-own, rental-purchase, lease-purchase trade. RTO Online (Rent to Own Online) represents the choice of the entire RTO Industry for trusted information, as it happens.

Tell us what you think
Rate the article at the top of this page