|
|
|
|
|
Factoids |
| |
|
|
| Your cost of maintaining the account does not change simply
because the item is pre-rented |
| Offering multiple rates and terms for the same merchandise
blurs the line between rental and retail |
| Rule of thumb: Reduce the term by 1 (one) month for every 3
(three) months rented |
Once a piece of merchandise comes back to the store, how do you
decide what to rent it for next time? Should you lower the term or lower the
rate? In my travels to rental dealers across the country, I’ve seen this dilemma
handled many different ways. Some dealers lower the term (length of rental to
acquire ownership), others lower the rates, and there are even some who do both.
So what is the best option?
What is the customer paying for?
First, let’s agree on one fact. Our customer is simply paying a fee for the use
of the rental product. This has, after all, been our argument for years as to
why rent-to-own should not be classified as a retail installment type loan. So
if that is the case, how can you justify renting the same product to two
different customers at two different rates? Both customers are, in fact, paying
for the same thing, the use of the rented product. So how can we justify
charging a lower rate to the renter of a pre-rented item? Quite simply, you can
not. The same is true for dealers that offer multiple rates and terms. For
example, offering a choice of higher rates at a shorter term in addition to the
traditional rate and term. This practice also “blurs the line” between rental
purchase and retail financing.
Agreement Cost
With that being said, there are other important considerations. For example,
your cost of maintaining the account does not change simply because the item is
pre-rented. You must still pay someone to deliver the pre-rented product,
collect on the account and perhaps even service the pre-rented product.
Additionally, your other operating expenses do not change as a result of renting
a pre-rented product at a lower rate. So all things considered, adjusting the
term makes the most sense.
Rule of Thumb
When it comes to lowering the term, there are other factors to consider. The
condition of the pre-rented piece is obviously one consideration. But if the
item shows only normal wear, what is a fair reduction in term. A good “rule of
thumb” would be to reduce the term by 1 (one) month for every 3 (three) months
rented. This practice allows a fair reduction of term while still moving the
piece out of inventory before its service life is over.
|
RTO Online is the official channel for Rent-to-Own Industry News and the
only independent source of news for the rent-to-own, rental-purchase,
lease-purchase trade. RTO Online (Rent to Own Online) represents the choice
of the entire RTO Industry for trusted information, as it happens. |
|
Tell us what you think
Rate the article at the top of this page |
|
|
|
|