Rent to Own Online
"All Rent to Own...All the Time"

Home

| About RTO Online | RTO Tradeshow | Press
#1 Online Destination For the Rent to Own Industry
Trade portal for companies who rent to own furniture, electronics, appliances, custom wheels, jewelry and other home goods.
Rent to Own Online
Rent to Own Tradeshow
Who's Who in rent to own  
The Rent to Own industry's event photo album  
Video podcast interviews with Rent-to-Own industry professionals  
Audio podcast interviews with Rent-to-Own industry professionals  
Rent-to-Own Industry Federal Legislative Guide  
Rent to Own Industry Jobs and Resumes  
Search Rent to Own Online  
Subscribe to
RTO Magazine

E-mail Address :

Manage Subscriptions
 
RTO Magazine
 
United States Rent to Own Store Locator  
State Rent to Own Law  
Rent to Own Websites  
Rent to Own Industry Poll  
Editorials By Rent to Own Professionals  
Rent to Own Stocks  
Rent to Own Links  
Rent to Own Industry Events  
Rent to Own Online Archive  
Rent to Own Industry Training  
Advertise on the number one website for rent to own professionals  
Rent to Own Industry Blog  
Rent to Own Chat  
Rent to Own Industry Forum  
Rent to Own Industry Glossary  
National News  
Contact Rent to Own Online  
 

Site Statistics

 

Poll

 

Retailers Express Concerns Over Identity Theft Act of 2007
04-25-07
RTO Online - The rent to own industry's trade website
Email this page to a friend

Rate: 

Your email address Worthless Helpful I have tears of joy Better than War and Peace

Add your Comments

Factoids

Back to news

Related Articles
most recent first

House Committee to Markup Consumer Financial Protection Act
California Democrat Cosponsors Rent-to-Own Legislation
Consumer Protection Agency Hearing Set for Wednesday
Wexler Supports Rental Purchase Act
Rent to Own Legislation Gains New Support
Box Clever Won't Go Away; Prosecutors Plan Retrial
Mike McConnell: Policy Matters Ohio Tactics "Soviet"
Editorial: Democrat Health Bill Could Handicap Small Businesses

Multiple Trade Associations Move Industry Forward

New York City Electronics Recycling Law Could Add Millions to Cost
SBA Activity Gives False Impression of Recovery
Rent-A-Center Denies Washington AG Allegations
Washington AG Accuses Rent-a-Center of Harassment
Retailers Welcome CIT Deal to Avoid Bankruptcy
Rental Purchase Act House Co-Sponsorship Breaks 100
Barney Frank to Fast-Track Consumer Protection Agency Bill
Legislation Reduces Small Business Start-up Costs
Association Launches Furniture Industry Advocacy Site
The State of Small Business
New Federal Agency May Have Rent-to-Own Industry Oversight
Landrieu Hosts Small Business Outreach Conference
Missouri Becomes Second State With Full House Support for Rental Purchase Act
Policy Matters Ohio Rent-to-Own Report
Republicans Have Chance to Unseat Wisconsin Gov Doyle
Association Urges Senate to Reject Pay-or-Play Employer Health Care Mandate
Frequently Asked Questions on Identity Theft Rules

Rent-A-Center Makes the RTO Industry's Case

Republicans Move to De-Fund Anti-Rent to Own Group
Rent-A-Center Prepares Strong Case for High Court
Pressure Increasing on Congress to Reject Employee Free Choice Act
Deceptive Practices Could Cost Conn's $40 Million
Revised Furniture Tip-Over Standard Issued
Report: Conservatism is Dead Man Walking
Explanation of Antitrust Concerns Facing Trade Associations
Obama Pledges Support For Small Business
Op-ed: Status of Small Businesses, By Sens. Mary Landrieu and Olympia Snowe
Democrats Slow to Support Rental Purchase Act
Dear Mr. President, Enough
Trans Secretary Ray LaHood to Keynote DC Retail Conference
Small Business Owners Fear Employee Free Choice Act
Will the Rental Purchase Act Become Law?
Obama Popular, Appointees not so much
Arlen Specter Hands Democrats Unbreakable Majority
Giving the Rent-to-Own Industry a Voice
Financial Services Committee Clears Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights
Nationwide Rental Coalition Brings New Blood to Washington DC
Missouri Appliance Sales Tax Holiday Begins
Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Conference Attendee Toolkit
Minnesota's Bachman Supports Rental Purchase Act
Editorial: Bless Me Father For I Might Be A Democrat
New England Rental Dealers Set National Focus
Do-Not-Call Goes Postal; San Francisco Passes Do-Not-Mail Resolution
Zogby; Business Leaders Not Happy with Obama's First 60 Days
Text of Rental Purchase Act Released
Electronics Industry to Congress "No More DTV Transition Delays"
Landrieu Schumer Team Up; Call for Small Business Advocate
CEA; Employee Free Choice Act Harmful
Northeast Rental Dealers to Meet March 31
Obama Pledges $15 Billion to Unlock Commercial Credit
RTO Act Supporter Landrieu Receives Economic Development Award
Letter to the Editor; Employee Free Choice Act Gives Workers a Voice
Franchise Association Says Employee Free Choice Act Bad for Business
RNC Releases Jim Cramer Response To The White House
Barney Frank Vows to Continue Financial Reform Agenda
Rental Association Sees Stimulus as Welcome Relief
Anti Rent-to-Own Group Nominated for New York Times Award
Americans File Taxes Earlier; Retailers Urged to plan Early Promotions

Registration Deadline for Free Rooms at Legislative Conference Nears

Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Action Database Update
IRS Issues Updated Withholding Tables
Association Urges Congress To Overturn Ban On Same-As-Cash
Stimulus Bill Expands Small Business Expensing Limits
Theft of Leased Property Bill Introduced in Missouri Assembly
Georgia Seeks to Impose Strict Security for Online Rent-to-Own
Groundwork Laid for Consumer Rental Purchase Act of 2009
Majority of Voters Oppose Obama Economic Recovery Plan
Stimulus Not Enough; Retailers Call for National Sales Tax Holidays
Fed Survey; Commercial Credit Remains Tight
Provision to Expand Lawsuits Include in Stimulus Package
Freddie Mac to Offer Rent-to-Own Option on Foreclosed Homes
APRO Continues Tradeshow Co-Location Debate
APRO Calls On President to Follow State Example in RTO Regulation
NY Mayor Bloomberg Announces Underbanked Savings Program
Louisiana Rental Dealers to Attend New Orleans NRC Event
Ralph Nader Calls on Obama to Strengthen Consumer Protections
NRC and State RTO Association Meeting Scheduled for March
New York City Council Sets Rent-to-Own Hearing
Preemption Top Concern for Attorneys General
Rental-Purchase Act Supporter Hensarling Appointed Ranking Member of Key Subcommittee
Recipe for Disaster; 260 Democrats and One Can of Whoop-Ass
RTO Supporter Senator Landrieu Shakes Up Staff
Third of 111th Congress Freshman Own Small Businesses
Association Urges Obama to Move Quickly on Stimulus Package
Office of Thrift Supervision Issues Final Credit Card Rule
Association Calls for Federal Action on Rent-to-Own Law
RTO Industry Supporter Mary Landrieu to Chair Senate Committee
New York Rent-to-Own Protests Continue; Habitat Exec Clarifies Remarks
New England Rental Dealers Elect Officers; 4 New Podcasts
Massachusetts Court to Hear Rent-A-Center Motion to Dismiss $5 Million Suit
Rent-to-Own Industry Supporter Saxby Chambliss Runnoff Today
NRC Announces Tri-state Rental Dealer Association
Nationwide Rental Coalition Organizes Connecticut Trade Association
Massachusetts Rent-to-Own Dealers Form Trade Association
Paul Davis of Nation's Rent-to-Own Enters Local California Politics
Election Night Poll; 77 Percent of Democrats Say Frivolous Lawsuits Hurt Economy

From English as Official Language to Payday Loans; Citizen Ballot Initiatives On the Rise

Advance America CEO "Deeply Troubled"; Comments on Ohio Payday Lending Law
U.S. Companies Preparing for Rise in Litigation Following Two Years of Declines
Nationwide Southwest Sponsors RTO Industry Pros at Texas Governor's Mansion
RTO Industry Supporter Landrieu Poised for Come From Behind Victory
Experts Fear Democratic Congress Will Pass Lawsuit-Expanding Provisions
Schumer Proposes Small Business Stimulus Package; NRF Asks Congress for Another Round of Checks
Nationwide Rental Coalition Seeks Support From NY Senator Hillary Clinton
Texas Democrat Announces Support of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Civil Rights Commission Report; U.S. Voter Fraud Requires Immediate Attention
Aaron's Announces Support for Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Obama Widens Lead Over McCain; Obama 48%, McCain 39%
Fed Moves to Free Up Commercial Credit; Will Purchase Commercial Paper
NAAG Issues National Top 10 List Of Consumer Complaints

NRF Says U.S. in "Profound Economic Crisis"; Urges Senate Action

California Rep Becomes 100th Supporter of Rental Purchase Act
Little Known Rent-to-Own Industry Legislative Facts
Ranking Ways and Means Republican Supports Rental-Purchase Act
Rent-to-Own Transaction Favored in Ralph Nader's 10-Point Plan
Nationwide Rental Coalition Legislative Conference Changes Venue to Accommodate Larger Turnout
Billions Spent Preparing for Digital Transition Deadline; Transition Trivia
NCPA Endorses Sarah Palin as Republican Vice Presidential Nominee
Small Business Not Politically Active; One Quarter Donate to Campaigns
New Poll Shows RTO Sponsor Landrieu Over Kennedy by 16 Points
RentDirect Covering Cost of First 200 Legislative Conference Registrants
RTO Champ Landrieu Falls Behind Challenger Kennedy
Ohio Governor Strickland Offers Mandatory Sick Leave Compromise
UK Rent to Own Company Launches Records Dumping Inquiry
Senator Lieberman: Rent to Own "Sad Reality"
Barney Frank, Maxine Waters Urge Voluntary Halt to Foreclosures
States Extend Sales Tax Holidays to Appliances
The Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Guide
The Do Not Call List and You
Republican Kay Granger Backs Rental Purchase Agreement Act
RentDirect Launches Rent-to-Own Industry Trade Association
Congressional Approval Rating at All-Time Low
SEMA Elects New Board
Legal Duties of Nonprofit Board Members
IRS Approves 17 Percent Increase in Business Mileage Deduction
Federal Reserve Seeking Nominations for Consumer Council
Kanjorski to Back Rental Purchase Agreement Act
UK RTO BoxClever Banker Acquitted
RentDirect Developing Legislative Action Alternative to APRO
Congress Introduces Home Office Deduction Simplification Act
Lawmakers Urged to Vote No on Rent-to-Own Amendment
Senator Schumer; Color Coded
Nationwide Pulls APRO Financial Support Over Ethical Concerns
Nationwide Responds To APRO TRIB Alliance
Can Rent to Own Association Remain Independent?
New Jersey Rent to Own Bill Scheduled For Hearing
Senate Passes Lawsuit Protection Over Credit Card Receipts
House Passes Law Making it Easier to Remodel Retail Stores
Check 'n Go Pays $220,000 Settlement After Customer Records Found In Dumpster
What's Next For Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Clinton Overtakes Obama With Democrats Nationally
National Governors Association Presses Congress For Unemployment Extension
SBA Recommends Alternatives to Social Security No-Match Rule
West Virginia, Louisiana Worst State Lawsuit Climates
Videocast With Jeff Everson, Regional Representative for Senator Mary Landrieu
Chairman Barney Frank Call for GAO Study on Fair Lending Enforcement
Congressional Brain Trust Sponsors Rent to Own Legislation
Senior Republicans Announce Support of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
CEA Tells Congress Consumer Education on Digital Transition Working
Drive to Simplify IRS Home Office Deduction Gaining Steam
Gas Prices High Enough; Americans Tell Congress No More Gas Taxes
NHTSA's Proposed Tire Registry Rule Gets SBA Support
Seven Term Iowa Republican Tom Latham Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
One Fifth of U.S. Households Will Spend Stimulus Package Funds on Consumer Electronics
Elliot Spitzer To Resign; Ethics King Involved In Prostitution Ring
Freshman New Yorker Pushes Rental Purchase Agreement Act Cosponsors Over 80; Senate Stalled at 21
Indiana Blue Dog Baron Hill First Indiana Rep to Support Rental Purchase Agreement Act of 2007
Ohio Association Strongly Opposes Mandatory Paid Sick Leave Act
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gets Seven New Cosponsors
Ralph Nader Seeks To Influence Obama, Clinton on Rent-to-Own, Payday
Iowa Rent to Own Bill Copies West Virginia; DOA in Iowa House
Indiana Senate Takes First Look At Rent-to-Own Property Legislation
Eleven Term Tennessee Republican John Duncan Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Republican Trio LaTourette, Aderholt, King Cosponsor Rental Purchase Agreement Act
National Federation of Independent Business Endorses Widener For Ohio Senate
Missouri Reps Akin and Graves Support Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Consumers Can Sue Debt Collector, Federal Court Rules
Business Activity Tax Simplification Act (BATSA) Introduced in House
New Jersey Rent-to-own Bill Introduced With Ten Co-sponsors
Iowa Senate Committee Votes To Modify Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Law
Family And Medical Leave Act Extended To Cover Members Of Armed Services
Barack Obama Backs Plan To Cap Payday Loans
Congressman Barney Frank's Rookie Mistake
State of the Union Rated Poor by 4 Out of 5 Americans
National Taxpayer Advocate To IRS Calls For Simplified Home Office Deduction
Fed Chairman Bernanke Voices Inflation Concerns
TARA Lobbyist Terral Smith Named Texas House Speaker Chief of Staff
Third Rent to Own Industry Supporter In Six Months Resigns From Congress; Rep Richard Baker Resigns To Head Association
Editorial
Clinton, Edwards, Obama Pander To Consumer Activists
Roger Wicker To Replace Retiring Trent Lott In U.S. Senate
Oregon Check Cashing Limits Take Effect Today
Minimum Wage Hikes Will Cause Job Loss
House Small Business Committee Unanimously Approves Regulatory Improvement Act; Changes Will Reduce the Regulatory Burden on Small Firms
Fed Cuts Prime Rate; Barney Frank, "It's Not Enough"
Pennsylvania Democrat Holden Supports Pro Rent to Own Industry Bill
Rent to Own Industry Supporter Trent Lott To Resign From Senate
Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Senate Cosponsor At 21
Providence Rhode Island Mayor's Task Force Recommends Allowing City To Ban Rent to Own And Other Services
New York State Rental Dealers To Combat Negative Rent to Own Industry Perceptions
Fed Updates Consumer Lease Disclosure Requirements
Seven Term Mississippi Representative Roger Wicker Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Cosponsor Count at 61
Message To Attorneys General, Stop Threatening Business With Criminal Prosecution To Force Settlements
Podcast on the Ramifications of Congress' Delay In Passing the Alternative Minimum Tax Patch
Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Senate Cosponsor Count Hits 20
Congress to Hold Hearing on Organized Retail Crime
No-Match Letters And You; Groups Continue Fight Against Burdensome Citizenship Rules
Ohio Freshman Representative Zachary Space Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Cosponsor Count Hits 60
North Carolina Blue Dog Democrat McIntyre Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
New York Democrat Representative Clarke Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Presidential Candidates Failing To Connect; Hillary Clinton Generates the Most Positive and Negative Response
Rent-A-Center Rescues Vandalized Buffalo, New York Club; Buffalo Mayor Brown Recognizes RAC For Community Involvement
National Governors Association Wants Internet Tax
Interview With Gloria Homeier-Schwein, Owner, A Full House Rentals
Interview With Express Rentals Owner Jean-Guy Poulin
North Carolina Representative Hayes Cosponsors Rental Purchase Agreement Act For First Time; House Count at 57, Senate 19
Poll; People Twice As Likely To Trust Bloggers Than Congress or the Media
Barack Obama Generates More Unique Website Visitors Than Top Three Republicans Combined; Thompson Leads Among Republicans
Two Southern Republicans Cosponsor Rental Purchase Agreement Act; House Count at 55, Senate 18
Poll Shows Conservatives Favor Fred Thompson Over Next Closest Republican 2-1 Even Before Announcement
Federal Reserve To Hold Underbanked Consumer Conference; BAI To Host Webinar on Tools for Unbanked Consumers
Ohio Representative Pryce Announces Retirement From Congress
New York Legislature Galvanizes Rental Dealers; Legislative Conference Set For January
Association Seeks Administrative Changes To National Do Not Call Registry
New Democrat Bobby Etheridge (NC) 50th Cosponsor to Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Former Blue-Dog Representative Ralph Hall Cosponsors Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Minimum Wage Increases To $5.85 Today
California Supreme Court Rules Against Frivolous Lawsuits
Tennessee Governor Signs Regulatory Flexibility Law; Requires Lawmakers To Consider Legislative Impact On Small Business
Just Say No To Government-Mandated Paid Sick Leave
Texas Governor Signs Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Provisions
Barack Obama Narrows Hillary Clinton's Lead Among Democrats; Democrats Lead Republicans Overall By 8 Points
New Jersey Democrats Go After RTO Homes
Presidential Politics; Rudy Giuliani's Lead Shrinks As Fred Thompson Moves Solidly Into Second Place In GOP Race
Direct Comparison Of Rental Purchase Agreement Act and Rent to Own Reform Act
House Financial Services Committee Schedules Hearing On Future of Consumer Protection
Schumer To Introduce Rent to Own Legislation
Recycling Tax Proposed For Consumer Electronics; Consumers To Pay At Point of Sale
Fed Seeks New Disclosure Requirements
Lawsuits Drain Economy, Alter Business Decisions; U.S. Chamber: 'Broken Lawsuit System' Hurts Small Businesses
Small Business Lending Bill Clears Committee
Hillary Clinton Widens Lead Over Barack Obama; Gore, Edwards Show No Signs Of Success
Barney Frank, John Dingell Call For Federal Regulation Of Payday Lending And Other Financial Services
Association Calls On Congress To Pass H.R. 1201, the Fair Use Act
Federal Reserve To Begin Comprehensive Study Of The Economic Condition Of American Families
Retailers Express Concerns Over Identity Theft Act of 2007
Georgia Senator Isakson Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
SBA Counsel Recommends Sarbanes-Oxley Relief
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gains 10 Cosponsors
Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act; HR 1767
Politics On the Web; Younger Audiences Prefer Barack Obama, The Money Prefers Hillary
House Financial Services Committee Passes Shareholders Vote on Executive Compensation Act
Association Supports Federal Trade Commission's Charges Against Mystery Shopping Service
More States Consider Small Business Regulatory Flexibility
FCC Declines To Set Mandatory Conversion Date For Digital Radio
Government Interference in Companies' Salary Policy Sets Dangerous Precedent
Rent to Own Property Tax Amendment Reported Favorably Out Of Committee
Arkansas Law Gives Small Business Owners A Voice In The State Regulatory Process
Democrat Hillary Clinton Takes Early Lead in Online Race to the White House; Double The Traffic of Three Top Republicans Combined
Democrats Vote to Suspend Basic Guarantees of Democracy in Union Elections
Rent to Own Property Tax Amendment Scheduled For Public Hearing
Texas State Senator Carona To Re-introduce TARA Supported Constitutional Amendment
New York Introduces Bill To Ban Spinner Rims
Report; Small Business Startups Drive State Economies
Texas Rental Dealers Wrap Legislative Conference; Solid Start To 80th Session
Senate Approves Minimum Wage Hike
New York Democrat and PIRG Hero Maloney To Chair House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit
Texas Democrat Harold Dutton Introduces Rent to Own Price Cap
Rent To Own Industry Execs Set Legislative Agenda At Dallas Conference
It Begins; New York City Councilmen Lay Groundwork For Schumer's Anti RTO Legislation
West Virginia Rental Dealers Association Meeting Planned For March
Coalition Formed To Fight Government Attempts to Limit Financial Services To Low and Moderate Income Consumers
National Black Caucus of State Legislators Claims Credit Scores Used to Deny African-Americans Access to Financial Services
Text of Proposed New York Rental Purchase Legislation; Links to New York Legislators
APRO Hosts Legislative Conference; All North American Rent to Own Companies Urged to Attend
Transcript of Remarks by Chairman Barney Frank on Wages at the National Press Club
Incoming House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank to Address the National Press Club; 'Waging War on Wages'
Rent to Own Legislation 101; A Real World Guide To Communicating With Legislators
Politics; 50 Percent of Democrats Want Hillary Nominated; 32 Percent Say Obama
Lawmakers Vote to Maintain Payday Lending in Virginia
FiSCA Weighs In On Center For Responsible Lending Payday Loan Report; Study Misrepresents Data Regarding Rollovers, Fails To Address Hi-Cost Alternatives
Video Gaming Association Lawsuit Successful; Michigan To Pay Over $180,000 In Legal Fees
Association Trashes Center For Responsible Lending Payday Loan Report; Report Misrepresents Industry
Gallup Poll; Nine of Ten Small Business Owners Will Vote In Upcoming Congressional Elections
Association Backs Digital Freedom Campaign
Pennsylvania Uses $20 Million Taxpayer Dollars For Government Funded Payday Loan Program
Top 10 Reasons To Vote Republican In the Upcoming Election
Complete Text Of Schumer's Rent to Own Protection Act
U.S. Labor Department Launches Web site to Help Employers Comply with Health Benefit Laws
Senator Chuck Schumer; The Most Trusted Man In Congress
Senate Banking Committee To Hear Testimony On DOD Payday Lending, Rent to Own Report
Legislative; Study Claims Term Limits At Heart Of Uncivil Legislatures
New Jersey Supremes Rule Against Class Action Waivers In Binding Arbitration Clause
Schumer's Office Pushing Bogus Rent to Own Report
Retailers Urge Trading Status For Vietnam; Move Could Increase Furniture Imports
Proposed Legislation Could Raise Cost Of Electronics; Analog Hole Legislation is a Bad Solution in Search of a Problem
Minnesota Attempts Bill To Fine Stores, Underage Kids For Renting M Rated Games; Association Seeks to have Law Declared Unconstitutional
Michigan Car Dealer Fined For Violations Of Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Rental Purchase Amendment Fails In Committee
El Paso Rental Dealer Hosts Bi-Partisan Luncheon For Key Texas Representative
Governors Oppose Business Activity Tax Simplification Act; Say Legislation is an Intrusion into States’ Authority
Rent A Center; New Jersey Ruling Not Expected To Affect Other States
New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Perez v. Rent-A-Center; Says Rent to Own Agreements "Similar" to Retail Sales
Rental Purchase Act Passes Wisconsin Assembly; Bill Goes To Governor
Reminder; Anti Business Bill On New York Judiciary Committee Agenda
U.S. Senate Banking Committee Hearing On Federal Rent To Own Law "As Expected"; Chairman wants action within 30 days as part of regulatory relief
New Jersey Assembly Committee Overwhelmingly Approves Rental Purchase Act; Bill Moves Forward
Rental Purchase Act Scheduled For Hearing In New Jersey Assembly; Act Introduced In Senate
Florida Representative Tom Feeney Supports Rental Purchase Agreement Act
The Financial Data Protection Act of 2005 Introduced; Would Require Tighter Store Level Security
Wisconsin Moves One Step Closer To Mainstream Rental Purchase Legislation
Tennessee Duo Co-Sponsor Rental Purchase Act
Wisconsin Legislators To Debate Rent to Own Law
Rental Purchase Agreement Act; Flurry Of Support Follows Successful Committee Hearing
Senate Hearing Set For Rental Purchase Act; House Co-Sponsor Count Hits 30
New Jersey RTO Bill Hearing Scheduled
Eight More Legislators Endorse Rental Purchase Agreement Act
Former HUD Secretary Endorses Rental Purchase Agreement Act
House Overwhelmingly Approves Business Checking Freedom Act of 2005; 424-1
Bad Policy Starts Small; Alabama Town Proposes Tax On Rent to Own Payments
Long Battle To Raise Maximum Late Fees Comes To Successful Conclusion In Texas
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gets Flurry Of Support
Texas House To Vote On Rent To Own Late Fee Bill
Rental Purchase Agreement Act Gains 3 Key Co-Sponsors
Rent To Own Agreement History Can Benefit Consumers; House Subcommittee To Hold Hearing Next Week
North Dakota Democrat Supports Rental Purchase Act
RTO Amendment Clears Texas House; Passes Unanimously
New Jersey Rent to Own Bill Scheduled For Hearing This Week
U.S. House Approves Resolution Promoting Small Business Bill of Rights
Bedding And Late Fee Bills Progressing In Texas Legislature
Rent to Own Coalition Gains Cosponsors; Holds 50 Meetings With Legislators
RTO Legislative Conference Kicks Off In DC
Rent A Center Class Action Dismissed In Arkansas
Rental Purchase Disclosure Bill Introduced In House of Representatives
The Coalition for Fair Rental Regulations Invites RTO Dealers To Join Effort; Legislative Conference Set For April
Consumer Rental Purchase Agreement Act of 2005 Introduced In Senate
Rent To Own Legislation Introduced In New Jersey

 

One section of the bill addressing the use of Social Security numbers could interfere with the legitimate use of those numbers in identifying employees for purposes of immigration compliance, wages and benefits.

The National Retail Federation, the world's largest retail trade association, expressed concern today regarding the credit freeze provision and other requirements of a national uniform standard for data breach notification that would be created under an identity theft bill being considered by a Senate committee.

The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee is scheduled to vote this afternoon on S. 1178, the Identity Theft Protection Act of 2007, sponsored by committee Ranking Member Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. See complete text of the Identity Theft Protection Act of 2007 below.

advertise here

"Disparate notification standards create significant compliance burdens for businesses that operate in many different states and may also lead to confusion for consumers," NRF Senior Vice President for Government Relations Steve Pfister said in a letter to committee members, noting the 36 state-level notification laws enacted over the past four years. "NRF supports efforts to create a clear and uniform national standard for data breach notification."

"The current draft of S. 1178, while effectively dealing with the issue or preemption, contains an unworkable notice trigger which we believe could lead to the ineffective and cumbersome over-notification of consumers who are not at risk of identity theft," Pfister wrote. "NRF agrees with the stated position of the Federal Trade Commission that data security legislation should cover incidents that pose a 'significant risk' of harm to the consumer."

Other aspects of the bill's notification requirements are also problematic, including notification of credit reporting agencies. A section requiring that parties with a "direct relationship" with a consumer make notification of breaches could create confusion for both business and consumers as to who is responsible, Pfister said. Noting that retailers accept third-party credit, handle private label cards operated by outside financial institutions, and operate third-party lease departments within their stores, "determining the best party to provide notice to the consumer may require more consideration than the bill now allows for," he said.

NRF also expressed concern over a provision in the bill that would allow consumers to place a security freeze on their credit files, and urged senators to allow victim protection provisions enacted under the 2003 Fair and Accurate Transactions Act to be fully implemented before acting.

"Credit file freeze is a complicated issue with many potentially detrimental effects for consumers," Pfister said. "Credit reports are used for many purposes in a retail business, from authorizing credit for emergency purchases such as a new refrigerator or hot water heater to completing routine cell phone contracts."

Another section of the bill addressing the use of Social Security numbers could interfere with the legitimate use of those numbers in identifying employees for purposes of immigration compliance, wages and benefits, Pfister said.

 

 

S 1178 IS


110th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 1178
To strengthen data protection and safeguards, require data breach notification, and further prevent identity theft.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 20, 2007
Mr. INOUYE (for himself, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. PRYOR, and Mr. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To strengthen data protection and safeguards, require data breach notification, and further prevent identity theft.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) SHORT TITLE- This Act may be cited as the `Identity Theft Prevention Act'.

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

Sec. 2. Protection of sensitive personal information.

Sec. 3. Notification of security breach risk.

Sec. 4. Security freeze.

Sec. 5. Information security and consumer privacy advisory committee.

Sec. 6. Related crime study.

Sec. 7. Prohibition on technology mandates.

Sec. 8. Enforcement.

Sec. 9. Enforcement by State attorneys general.

Sec. 10. Preemption of State law.

Sec. 11. Definitions.

Sec. 12. Authorization of appropriations.

Sec. 13. Effective dates.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFORMATION.

(a) IN GENERAL- A covered entity shall develop, implement, maintain, and enforce a written program for the security of sensitive personal information the entity collects, maintains, sells, transfers, or disposes of, containing administrative, technical, and physical safeguards--

(1) to ensure the security and confidentiality of such data;

(2) to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such data; and

(3) to protect against unauthorized access to, or use of, such data that could result in substantial harm to any individual.

(b) COMPLIANCE WITH FTC STANDARDS REQUIRED- A covered entity that is in full compliance with the requirements of the Commission's rules on Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information and Disposal of Consumer Report Information and Records is deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of subsection (a).

(c) REGULATIONS- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall promulgate regulations, in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, that require procedures for authenticating the credentials of any third party to which sensitive personal information is to be transferred or sold by a covered entity.

SEC. 3. NOTIFICATION OF SECURITY BREACH RISK.

(a) Security Breaches Affecting 1,000 or More Individuals-

(1) IN GENERAL- If a covered entity discovers a breach of security that affects 1,000 or more individuals, then, before conducting the notification required by subsection (c), it shall--

(A) report the breach to the Commission (or other appropriate Federal regulator under section 8); and

(B) notify all consumer reporting agencies described in section 603(p)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(p)(1)) of the breach.

(2) FTC WEBSITE PUBLICATION- Whenever the Commission receives a report under paragraph (1)(A), after the notification required by subsection (c) has begun, it shall post a report of the breach of security on its website without disclosing any sensitive personal information pertaining to the individuals affected (including their names).

(3) CONTENTS OF REPORT- The report described in paragraph (2) shall include--

(A) the number of individuals impacted by the breach of security; and

(B) confirmation that the covered entity has taken action to comply with the requirements of subsection (c).

(b) Security Breaches Affecting Fewer Than 1,000 Individuals-

(1) IN GENERAL- If a covered entity discovers a breach of security that affects the sensitive personal information of fewer than 1,000 individuals and determines that the breach of security does not create a reasonable risk of identity theft, it shall report the breach to the Commission (or other appropriate Federal regulator under section 8).

(2) REPORT CONTENTS- The report shall contain the number of individuals affected and the type of information that was exposed because of the breach of security.

(3) LIMITATION ON COMMISSION RESPONSE- With respect to a report under paragraph (1) received by the Commission, the Commission may not--

(A) disclose any sensitive personal information relating to the individuals (including their names); or

(B) publish such a report on its website.

(4) Determination of reasonable risk of identity theft-

(A) IN GENERAL- If a covered entity cannot make a determination as to whether the breach of security creates a reasonable risk of identity theft, it may request guidance from the Commission in writing as to a suggested course of action that may be required under this Act.

(B) TIME AND MANNER OF RESPONSE- The Commission shall respond to a request from a covered entity under subparagraph (A) in writing within 5 business days after the date on which it receives the request.

(c) NOTIFICATION OF CONSUMERS-

(1) IN GENERAL- A covered entity shall use due diligence to investigate any suspected breach of security affecting sensitive personal information maintained by that covered entity. If, after the exercise of such due diligence, the covered entity discovers a breach of security and determines that the breach of security creates a reasonable risk of identity theft, the covered entity shall notify each such individual. In determining whether a reasonable risk of identity theft exists, a covered entity shall consider such factors as whether--

(A) data containing sensitive personal information is usable or could be made usable by an unauthorized third party; and

(B) the data is in the possession and control of an unauthorized third party.

(2) DIRECT RELATIONSHIP WITH CONSUMER REQUIRED- The notice required by paragraph (1) must be provided by the entity which has a direct relationship with the parties whose information was subject to the breach. Unless there is an agreement to the contrary, the entity providing the notice shall be compensated for the cost of the notice required by the covered entity subject to the breach of security.

(d) Methods of Notification; Notice Content-

(1) IN GENERAL- A covered entity shall provide notice pursuant to subsection (c) by--

(A) written notice;

(B) electronic notice, if such notice is consistent with the provisions of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.); or

(C) substitute notice, if the covered entity does not have sufficient contact information for the individuals to be notified, consisting of--

(i) notice by electronic mail when the covered entity has an electronic mail address for affected individuals;

(ii) conspicuous posting of the security breach on the Internet website of the covered entity for a reasonable period, if the covered entity maintains a website (except that the information posted may not disclose any sensitive personal information pertaining to the affected individuals (including their names)); and

(iii) notification to major statewide media of the breach of security.

(2) CONTENT OF NOTICE- The notice required under paragraphs (1)(A) and (B) shall consist of--

(A) the name of the individual whose information was the subject of the breach of security;

(B) the name of the covered entity that was the subject of the breach of security;

(C) a description of the categories of sensitive personal information of the individual that were the subject of the breach of security;

(D) the date of discovery of such breach of security; and

(E) the toll-free numbers necessary to contact--

(i) each covered entity that was the subject of the breach of security;

(ii) each nationwide credit reporting agency; and

(iii) the Commission.

(e) Timing of Notification-

(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), notice required by subsection (c) shall be given--

(A) in a manner that is consistent with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the security and integrity of the data system; and

(B) in the most expeditious manner practicable, but not later than 25 business days after the date on which the breach of security was discovered by the covered entity.

(2) LAW ENFORCEMENT AND NATIONAL OR HOMELAND SECURITY RELATED DELAYS- Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the giving of notice as required by that paragraph may be delayed for a reasonable period of time if--

(A) a Federal or State law enforcement agency determines that the timely giving of notice under subsections (a) and (c), as required by paragraph (1), would materially impede a civil or criminal investigation; or

(B) a Federal national security or homeland security agency determines that such timely giving of notice would threaten national or homeland security.

(f) CERTAIN SERVICE PROVIDERS- Section 2 and subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this section do not apply to electronic communication of a third party stored by a cable operator, information service, or telecommunications carrier in the network of such operator, service or carrier in the course of transferring or transmitting such communication. Any term used in this subsection that is defined in the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) has the meaning given it in that Act.

SEC. 4. SECURITY FREEZE.

(a) In General-

(1) EMPLACEMENT- A consumer may place a security freeze on the consumer's credit report by making a request to a consumer credit reporting agency in writing, by telephone, or through a secure electronic connection if such a connection is made available by the consumer credit reporting agency.

(2) CONSUMER DISCLOSURE- If a consumer requests a security freeze, the consumer credit reporting agency shall disclose to the consumer the process of placing and removing the security freeze. A consumer credit reporting agency may not imply or inform a consumer that the placement or presence of a security freeze on the consumer's credit report may negatively affect the consumer's credit score.

(b) Effect of Security Freeze-

(1) RELEASE OF INFORMATION BLOCKED- If a security freeze is in place on a consumer's credit report, a consumer credit reporting agency may not release the credit report for consumer credit review purposes to a third party without prior express authorization from the consumer.

(2) INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THIRD PARTIES- Paragraph (1) does not prevent a consumer credit reporting agency from advising a third party that a security freeze is in effect with respect to the consumer's credit report. If a third party, in connection with a request for information in any circumstance under which a consumer credit reporting agency may furnish a consumer report under section 604(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681b), requests access to a consumer credit report on which a security freeze is in place, the third party may treat any application associated with the request as incomplete.

(3) CONSUMER CREDIT SCORE NOT AFFECTED- The placement of a security freeze on a credit report may not be taken into account for any purpose in determining the credit score of the consumer to whom the account relates.

(c) Removal; Temporary Suspension-

(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraphs (2)(B) and (4), a security freeze shall remain in place until the consumer requests that the security freeze be removed. A consumer may remove a security freeze on the consumer's credit report by making a request to a consumer credit reporting agency in writing, by telephone, or through a secure electronic connection made available by the consumer credit reporting agency.

(2) CONDITIONS- A consumer credit reporting agency may remove a security freeze placed on a consumer's credit report only--

(A) upon the consumer's request, pursuant to paragraph (1); or

(B) if the agency determines that the consumer's credit report was frozen due to a material misrepresentation of fact by the consumer.

(3) NOTIFICATION TO CONSUMER- If a consumer credit reporting agency intends to remove a freeze upon a consumer's credit report pursuant to paragraph (2)(B) or (4), the consumer credit reporting agency shall notify the consumer in writing prior to removing the freeze on the consumer's credit report.

(4) TEMPORARY SUSPENSION- A consumer may have a security freeze on the consumer's credit report temporarily suspended by making a request to a consumer credit reporting agency in writing or through a secure electronic connection made available by the consumer credit reporting agency and--

(A) specifying beginning and ending dates for the period during which the security freeze is not to apply to that consumer's credit report; or

(B) specifying a specific third party to which access to the credit report may be granted notwithstanding the freeze.

(d) Response Times; Notification of Other Entities-

(1) IN GENERAL- A consumer credit reporting agency shall--

(A) place a security freeze on a consumer's credit report under subsection (a) no later than 3 business days after receiving a request from the consumer under subsection (a)(1);

(B) remove a security freeze within 3 business days after receiving a request for removal from the consumer under subsection (c); and

(C) temporarily suspend a security freeze within 1 business day after receiving a request under subsection (c)(4).

(2) NOTIFICATION OF OTHER COVERED ENTITIES- If the consumer requests in writing, by telephone, or by secure electronic connection that other covered entities be notified of the request, the consumer credit reporting agency shall notify all other consumer credit reporting agencies described in section 603(p)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(p)(1)) of the request within 1 day of receiving the request.

(3) IMPLEMENTATION BY OTHER COVERED ENTITIES- A consumer credit reporting agency that is notified of a request under paragraph (2) to place, remove, or temporarily suspend a security freeze on a consumer's credit report shall--

(A) ensure the validity of the request, including verifying the identity of the requesting consumer, within 3 business days after receiving the notification; and

(B) place, remove, or temporarily suspend the security freeze on that credit report within 3 business days after validating the request, including verifying the identity of the requesting consumer and securing the fee under subsection (h)(1), if applicable.

(e) CONFIRMATION- Except as provided in subsection (c)(3), whenever a consumer credit reporting agency places, removes, or temporarily suspends a security freeze on a consumer's credit report at the request of that consumer under subsection (a) or (c), respectively, it shall send a written confirmation thereof to the consumer within 10 business days after placing, removing, or temporarily suspending the security freeze on the credit report. This subsection does not apply to the placement, removal, or temporary suspension of a security freeze by a consumer credit reporting agency because of a notification received under subsection (d)(2).

(f) ID REQUIRED- A consumer credit reporting agency may not place, remove, or temporarily suspend a security freeze on a consumer's credit report at the consumer's request unless the consumer provides proper identification (within the meaning of section 610(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681(h)(a)(1)) and the regulations thereunder.

(g) EXCEPTIONS- This section does not apply to the use of a consumer credit report by any of the following:

(1) A person or entity, or a subsidiary, affiliate, or agent of that person or entity, or an assignee of a financial obligation owing by the consumer to that person or entity, or a prospective assignee of a financial obligation owing by the consumer to that person or entity in conjunction with the proposed purchase of the financial obligation, with which the consumer has or had prior to assignment an account or contract, including a demand deposit account, or to whom the consumer issued a negotiable instrument, for the purposes of reviewing the account or collecting the financial obligation owing for the account, contract, or negotiable instrument.

(2) Any Federal, State or local agency, law enforcement agency, trial court, or private collection agency acting pursuant to a court order, warrant, subpoena, or other compulsory process.

(3) A child support agency or its agents or assigns acting pursuant to subtitle D of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. et seq.) or similar State law.

(4) The Department of Health and Human Services, a similar State agency, or the agents or assigns of the Federal or State agency acting to investigate medicare or medicaid fraud.

(5) The Internal Revenue Service or a State or municipal taxing authority, or a State department of motor vehicles, or any of the agents or assigns of these Federal, State, or municipal agencies acting to investigate or collect delinquent taxes or unpaid court orders or to fulfill any of their other statutory responsibilities.

(6) Any person or entity administering a credit file monitoring subscription to which the consumer has subscribed.

(7) Any person or entity for the purpose of providing a consumer with a copy of the consumer's credit report or credit score upon the consumer's request.

(8) Except when access is restricted to a specific third party during a temporary suspension of a security freeze under subsection (c)(4)(B), any person who seeks access during the time period that a security freeze is temporarily suspended for the purpose of facilitating the extension of credit or another permissible use.

(h) Fees-

(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), a consumer credit reporting agency may charge a fee, not in excess of $10, for placing a security freeze on a consumer's credit report. A consumer reporting agency may not charge a consumer for up to 2 requests per year per credit reporting agency for temporary suspension of a security freeze. If the consumer requests more than 2 temporary suspensions of a security freeze from a credit reporting agency within a year, then that consumer credit reporting agency may charge the consumer a fee for each such additional request, but that consumer credit reporting agency may not charge in excess of $5 per request. A consumer credit reporting agency may not charge a consumer for removing a security freeze.

(2) FEES PROHIBITED-

(A) ID THEFT VICTIMS- A consumer credit reporting agency may not charge a fee for placing, removing, or temporarily suspending a security freeze on a consumer's credit report if--

(i) the consumer is a victim of identity theft;

(ii) the consumer requests the security freeze in writing;

(iii) the consumer has filed a police report with respect to the theft, or an identity theft report (as defined in section 603(q)(4) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(q)(4))), within 180 days after the theft occurred or was discovered by the consumer; and

(iv) the consumer provides a copy of the report to the credit reporting agency.

(B) CATEGORICAL CLASSES- A consumer credit reporting agency may not charge a fee for placing, removing, or temporarily suspending a credit freeze on a consumer's credit report if the consumer requesting it--

(i) has attained the age of 65 years;

(ii) is on active duty or in the ready reserve component of an armed force of the United States; or

(iii) is the spouse of an individual described in clause (ii).

(i) Limitation on Information Changes in Frozen Reports-

(1) IN GENERAL- If a security freeze is in place on a consumer's credit report, a consumer credit reporting agency may not change any of the following official information in that credit report without sending a written confirmation of the change to the consumer within 30 days after the change is made:

(A) Name.

(B) Date of birth.

(C) Social security account number.

(D) Address.

(2) CONFIRMATION- Paragraph (1) does not require written confirmation for technical modifications of a consumer's official information, including name and street abbreviations, complete spellings, or transposition of numbers or letters. In the case of an address change, the written confirmation shall be sent to both the new address and to the former address.

(j) Certain Entity Exemptions-

(1) Resellers and other agencies-

(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the provisions of this Act do not apply to a consumer credit reporting agency that acts only as a reseller of credit information by assembling and merging information contained in the data base of another consumer credit reporting agency or multiple consumer credit reporting agencies, and does not maintain a permanent data base of credit information from which new consumer credit reports are produced.

(B) RESELLER TO HONOR FREEZES PLACED BY CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES- Section 4(b), and, to the extent applicable, section 8 of this Act apply to a consumer credit reporting agency described in subparagraph (A).

(2) OTHER EXEMPTED ENTITIES- The following entities are not required to place a security freeze in a credit report:

(A) A check services or fraud prevention services company, which issues reports on incidents of fraud or authorizations for the purpose of approving or processing negotiable instruments, electronic funds transfers, or similar methods of payments.

(B) A deposit account information service company, which issues reports regarding account closures due to fraud, substantial overdrafts, ATM abuse, or similar negative information regarding a consumer, to inquiring banks or other financial institutions for use only in reviewing a consumer request for a deposit account at the inquiring bank or financial institution.

SEC. 5. INFORMATION SECURITY AND CONSUMER PRIVACY ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

(a) Establishment- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Commission shall establish the Information Security and Consumer Privacy Advisory Committee.

(b) Membership- The Advisory Committee shall consist of 5 members appointed by the Chairman after appropriate consultations with relevant interested parties. Of the 5 members, the Advisory Committee shall contain at least 1 member from each of the following groups:

(1) A non-profit consumer advocacy group.

(2) A business organization that collects personally identifiable information.

(3) A state Attorney General's office.

(c) CHAIRPERSON- The Advisory Committee members shall elect 1 member to serve as chairperson of the Advisory Committee.

(d) FUNCTIONS- The Advisory Committee shall collect, review, disseminate, and advise on best practices for covered entities to protect sensitive personal information stored and transferred.

(e) REPORT- Not later than 12 months after the date on which the Advisory Committee is established under subsection (a) and annually thereafter, the Advisory Committee shall submit to Congress a report on its findings.

(f) NO TERMINATION- Section 14(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App 14(a)(2)) shall not apply to the Advisory Committee.

SEC. 6. RELATED CRIME STUDY.

(a) IN GENERAL- The Federal Trade Commission, in conjunction with the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies, shall undertake a study of--

(1) the correlation between methamphetamine use and identity theft crimes;

(2) the needs of law enforcement to address methamphetamine crimes related to identity theft, including production, trafficking, and the purchase of precursor chemicals; and

(3) the Federal Government's role in addressing and deterring identity theft crimes.

(b) REPORT- Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the Congress that includes--

(1) a detailed analysis of the correlation between methamphetamine use and identity theft crimes;

(2) the needs of law enforcement to address methamphetamine crimes related to identity theft including production, trafficking, and the purchase of precursor chemicals related to methamphetamine;

(3) the Federal Government's role in addressing and deterring identity theft crimes; and

(4) specific recommendations for means of reducing and preventing crimes involving methamphetamine and identity theft, including recommendations for best practices for local law enforcement agencies.

SEC. 7. PROHIBITION ON TECHNOLOGY MANDATES.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to permit the Commission to issue regulations that require or impose a specific technology, product, technological standards, or solution.

SEC. 8. ENFORCEMENT.

(a) ENFORCEMENT BY COMMISSION- Except as provided in subsection (c), this Act shall be enforced by the Commission.

(b) VIOLATION IS UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACT OR PRACTICE- The violation of any provision of this Act shall be treated as an unfair or deceptive act or practice proscribed under a rule issued under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)).

(c) ENFORCEMENT BY CERTAIN OTHER AGENCIES- Compliance with this Act shall be enforced exclusively under--

(1) section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818), in the case of--

(A) national banks, and Federal branches and Federal agencies of foreign banks, and any subsidiaries of such entities (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies, and investment advisers), by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;

(B) member banks of the Federal Reserve System (other than national banks), branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than Federal branches, Federal agencies, and insured State branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 601 and 611), and bank holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries or affiliates (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies and investment advisers), by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;

(C) banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (other than members of the Federal Reserve System), insured State branches of foreign banks, and any subsidiaries of such entities (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies and investment advisers), by the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and

(D) savings associations the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and any subsidiaries of such savings associations (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies and investment advisers), by the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision;

(2) the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) by the Board of the National Credit Union Administration Board with respect to any Federal credit union and any subsidiaries of such a credit union;

(3) the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) by the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to--

(A) a broker or dealer subject to that Act;

(B) an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.); and

(C) an investment advisor subject to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.); and

(4) State insurance law, in the case of any person engaged in providing insurance, by the applicable State insurance authority of the State in which the person is domiciled.

(d) EXERCISE OF CERTAIN POWERS- For the purpose of the exercise by any agency referred to in subsection (c) of its powers under any Act referred to in that subsection, a violation of this Act is deemed to be a violation of a requirement imposed under that Act. In addition to its powers under any provision of law specifically referred to in subsection (c), each of the agencies referred to in that subsection may exercise, for the purpose of enforcing compliance with any requirement imposed under this Act, any other authority conferred on it by law.

(e) OTHER AUTHORITY NOT AFFECTED- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit or affect in any way the Commission's authority to bring enforcement actions or take any other measure under the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) or any other provision of law.

(f) COMPLIANCE WITH GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT-

(1) NOTICE- Any covered entity that is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.), and gives notice in compliance with the notification requirements established for such covered entities under title V of that Act is deemed to be in compliance with section 3 of this Act.

(2) SAFEGUARDS- Any covered entity that is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.), and fulfills the information protection requirements established for such entities under title V of the Act and under section 607(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681e(a)) to protect sensitive personal information shall be deemed to be in compliance with section 2 of this Act.

SEC. 9. ENFORCEMENT BY STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL.

(a) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in section 8(c), a State, as parens patriae, may bring a civil action on behalf of its residents in an appropriate state or district court of the United States to enforce the provisions of this Act, to obtain damages, restitution, or other compensation on behalf of such residents, or to obtain such further and other relief as the court may deem appropriate, whenever the attorney general of the State has reason to believe that the interests of the residents of the State have been or are being threatened or adversely affected by a covered entity that violates this Act or a regulation under this Act.

(b) NOTICE- The State shall serve written notice to the Commission (or other appropriate Federal regulator under section 8) of any civil action under subsection (a) at least 60 days prior to initiating such civil action. The notice shall include a copy of the complaint to be filed to initiate such civil action, except that if it is not feasible for the State to provide such prior notice, the State shall provide such notice immediately upon instituting such civil action.

(c) AUTHORITY TO INTERVENE- Upon receiving the notice required by subsection (b), the Commission (or other appropriate Federal regulator under section 8) may intervene in such civil action and upon intervening--

(1) be heard on all matters arising in such civil action; and

(2) file petitions for appeal of a decision in such civil action.

(d) CONSTRUCTION- For purposes of bringing any civil action under subsection (a), nothing in this section shall prevent the attorney general of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general by the laws of such State to conduct investigations or to administer oaths or affirmations or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence.

(e) VENUE; SERVICE OF PROCESS- In a civil action brought under subsection (a)--

(1) the venue shall be a judicial district in which--

(A) the covered entity operates; or

(B) the covered entity was authorized to do business;

(2) process may be served without regard to the territorial limits of the district or of the State in which the civil action is instituted; and

(3) a person who participated with a covered entity in an alleged violation that is being litigated in the civil action may be joined in the civil action without regard to the residence of the person.

(f) LIMITATION ON STATE ACTION WHILE FEDERAL ACTION IS PENDING- If the Commission (or other appropriate Federal agency under section 8) has instituted a civil action or an administrative action for violation of this Act, no State attorney general, or official or agency of a State, may bring an action under this subsection during the pendency of that action against any defendant named in the complaint of the Commission or the other agency for any violation of this Act alleged in the complaint.

SEC. 10. PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW.

(a) NOTICE- This Act preempts any State or local law, regulation, or rule that requires a covered entity to notify individuals of breaches of security pertaining to them.

(b) INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAMS- This Act preempts any State or local law, regulation, or rule that requires a covered entity to develop, implement, maintain, or enforce information security programs to which this Act applies.

(c) SECURITY FREEZE-

(1) IN GENERAL- This Act shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any statute, regulation, order, or interpretation in effect in any State with regards to consumer credit reporting agencies compliance with a consumer's request to place, remove, or temporarily suspend the prohibition on the release by a credit reporting agency of information from its files on that consumer, except to the extent that such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.

(2) GREATER PROTECTION UNDER STATE LAW- For purposes of this section, a State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this subtitle if the protection of such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation affords any person is greater than the protection provided under this Act in regards to credit reporting agencies compliance with a consumer's request to place, remove, or temporarily suspend the prohibition on the release by a consumer credit reporting agency of information from its files on that consumer.

(d) LIMITATION OF PREEMPTION- Federal preemption under this Act shall only apply to matters expressly described in subsection (a) or (b) of this section, and shall have no effect on other State or local laws, regulations, or rules over covered entities.

SEC. 11. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) BREACH OF SECURITY- The term `breach of security' means unauthorized access to and acquisition of data in any form or format containing sensitive personal information that compromises the security or confidentiality of such information.

(2) COMMISSION- The term `Commission' means the Federal Trade Commission.

(3) CONSUMER CREDIT REPORTING AGENCY- The term `consumer credit reporting agency' means any person which, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages in whole or in part in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on consumers for the purpose of furnishing credit reports to third parties, and which uses any means or facility of interstate commerce for the purpose of preparing or furnishing credit reports.

(4) COVERED ENTITY- The term `covered entity' means a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other commercial entity, and any charitable, educational, or nonprofit organization, that acquires, maintains, or utilizes sensitive personal information.

(5) CREDIT REPORT- The term `credit report' means a consumer report, as defined in section 603(d) of the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(p)), as well as any associated credit score that is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing a consumer's eligibility for credit for personal, family or household purposes.

(6) IDENTITY THEFT- The term `identity theft' means the unauthorized acquisition, purchase, sale, or use by any person of an individual's sensitive personal information that--

(A) violates section 1028 of title 18, United States Code, or any provision of State law in pari materia; or

(B) results in harm to the individual whose sensitive personal information was used.

(7) REASONABLE RISK OF IDENTITY THEFT- The term `reasonable risk of identity theft' means that the preponderance of the evidence available to the covered entity that has experienced a breach of security establishes that identity theft for 1 or more individuals from the breach of security is forseeable.

(8) REVIEWING THE ACCOUNT- The term `reviewing the account' includes activities related to account maintenance, monitoring, credit line increases, and account upgrades and enhancements.

(9) Sensitive personal information-

(A) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), the term `sensitive personal information' means an individual's name, address, or telephone number combined with 1 or more of the following data elements related to that individual:

(i) Social security account number or an employer identification number that is the same as or is derived from the social security account number of that individual.

(ii) Financial account number, or credit card or debit card number of such individual, combined with any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to such individual's account.

(iii) State driver's license identification number or State resident identification number.

(B) PASSWORD ACCOUNTS- An account identifier combined with a password, PIN, or security code to access the account, for any account from which any of the following can occur without further authentication after login:

(i) A financial transaction.

(ii) A purchase of goods or services.

(iii) A charge to a payment card or account.

(iv) A charge to a credit card or account.

(v) Access to the account that reveals sufficient information to engage in any activity described in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv).

(C) FTC MODIFICATIONS- The Commission may, through a rulemaking proceeding in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, designate other identifying information that may be used to effectuate identity theft as sensitive personal information for purposes of this Act and limit or exclude any information described in subparagraph (A) from the definition of sensitive personal information for purposes of this Act.

(D) EXCEPTION- The term `sensitive personal information' does not include information that is obtained from--

(i) Federal, State, or local governments that has been made available to the general public; or

(ii) widely distributed media.

The exception provided by this subparagraph does not apply if the information obtained from Federal, State, or local government records or widely distributed media is combined with information obtained from non-public sources.

(E) PUBLIC RECORDS- Nothing in this Act prohibits a covered entity from obtaining, aggregating, or using sensitive personal information it lawfully obtains from public records in a manner that does not violate this Act.

SEC. 12. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011 to carry out this Act.

SEC. 13. EFFECTIVE DATES.

(a) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), the provisions of this Act take effect upon its enactment.

(b) IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITY PROGRAM- A covered entity shall implement the program required by section 2(a) within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

(c) PROVISIONS REQUIRING RULEMAKING- The Commission shall initiate 1 or more rulemaking proceedings under sections 2(c), 3, and 4 (including a rulemaking proceeding to determine what constitutes proper identification within the meaning of section 610(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681(h)(a)(1))) within 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act. The Commission shall promulgate all final rules pursuant to those rulemaking proceedings within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. The provisions of sections 2(c), 3, and 4 shall take effect on the same date 6 months after the date on which the Commission promulgates the last final rule under the proceeding or proceedings commenced under the preceding sentence.

(d) PREEMPTION- Section 10 shall take effect at the same time as sections 2(c), 3, and 4 take effect.
 

 

RTO Online is the official channel for Rent-to-Own Industry News and the only independent source of news for the rent-to-own, rental-purchase, lease-purchase trade. RTO Online (Rent to Own Online) represents the choice of the entire RTO Industry for trusted information, as it happens.

Tell us what you think
Rate the article at the top of this page